NEW AND INTERESTING IDEAS FOR Birds of Steel Developers

[mavrickandgoose]

I would like a team battle with 4 separate teams all battling it out I think that would be cool

[FOZ_1983]

Originally Posted by mavrickandgoose

I would like a team battle with 4 separate teams all battling it out I think that would be cool

Or ranked games that automatically pick your team for you, AXIS or ALLIES.


Once your assigned a team you can only use planes from the team your on.


Also... maybe all plane unlocks to be done OFFLINE or in singleplayer.


The majority do have access to PSN/XBL but some users do not, and they do not have the satisfaction of flying some planes in free flight.

[mavrickandgoose]

I agree on all plane unlocks offline and I am fine with not being able to pick teams but I don't want to be limited to either allied or axis planes I like to fly whatever I want

[Shadowcorp]

Originally Posted by FOZ_1983

Or ranked games that automatically pick your team for you, AXIS or ALLIES.


Once your assigned a team you can only use planes from the team your on.


Also... maybe all plane unlocks to be done OFFLINE or in singleplayer.


The majority do have access to PSN/XBL but some users do not, and they do not have the satisfaction of flying some planes in free flight.

I completely agree with you on that one in a ranked game it would be a good change of pace to not be able to choose your wingman or aircraft, it would stop some of the the relentless stackers. However in private games you should be given the freedom of choosing sides and aircraft.
And as for all the unlocks being done offline i agree also but how to implement it i'm not too sure.

[mavrickandgoose]

If a game is going to be RANKED it should not at all limit your plane choices if it does it becomes a matter of who is on the team with the best planes not at all a test of skill if you want a true who is better rank system then no limitations can be placed on planes if there are limits it's a handicap and should not be ranked and if your saying that wouldn't be fair because someone will always pick the best plane then guess what you can pick it too

[Shadowcorp]

perhaps... perhaps not, i think it would be better the other way. plus i think the private/ non ranked game needs to give the player the option to kick nuissance players those who aren't really in the the same game as everyone else

[FOZ_1983]

For a player match then by all means pick whatever team and plane you want

But for a ranked match i think it should pcik teams for you, as for the aircraft... pick whatever you want as long as it represents the correct team (axis/allies) it would be fair enough i think...

Spitfire v 109 being a prime example... they both go into a 1v1 pretty evenly.

But then again this was only an idea on my part, i do see where you come from with other suggestions or criticism of what i suggest

[mavrickandgoose]

I'm sorry there is NO way a spit v 109 match is close to even I would bow down and kiss the feet of ANYONE who beats me 1v1 with a 109 I don't understand your logic here for ranked matches with a handicapped plane choice. It's like giving one baseball team metal bats and the other wood or in NASCAR give half the teams stock cars and the other Indy cars how about telling boxers withch hand to punch with it's not a even fight and if we are going to do a ranked system like that shooting down a 109 in a spit should be worth 1/2 a point and shooting down a spit with a 109 should be worth 3