4.11 Development Update

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

Acceleration, energy retention and final velocities are wrong

I'm sure if you can provide all of the relevant details including the numbers and figures as well as the sources for the data they will get right on that.

[Treetop64]

Originally Posted by IceFire

I'm sure if you can provide all of the relevant details including the numbers and figures as well as the sources for the data they will get right on that.

I think you might be asking a bit much of the guy...

[EJGr.Ost_Caspar]

We will include a new difficulty option: 'sensitive matters' (if activated, it includes new FMs, DMs and anything else, that can be based on feelings... polished with a random pattern - for bad days and good days).

[Romanator21]

[SturmKreator]

Originally Posted by IceFire

I'm sure if you can provide all of the relevant details including the numbers and figures as well as the sources for the data they will get right on that.

Look, Im not a english speaker, so its a little difficult to me explain many things, but I speak spanish, if someone could translated would be great, I have 3 books were you see all Fockes FM all wrong, but WRONG, Doras, TAs, Antons, etc...

[JtD]

Data is numbers, and numbers have no language. Feel free to post them.

Or as google would say:
Datos son números, y números no tienen idioma.

[SturmKreator]

Originally Posted by JtD

Data is numbers, and numbers have no language. Feel free to post them.

Or as google would say:
Datos son números, y números no tienen idioma.

Or as google would say:

Los datos son números, y los números no tienen habla.

Thats the rigth form, In the last case the books was reviced by focke wulf pilots

[ECV56_Guevara]

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

Or as google would say:

Los datos son números, y los números no tienen habla.

Thats the rigth form, In the last case the books was reviced by focke wulf pilots

Sorry Sturm, the original google translation is ok. It talks about the universal understanding of maths. There s no need of translation where we talk about numbers.
Los numeros no tienen "idioma".
Y si, Sturm , es una de las pocas veces que el google la pega. Saludos!

[SturmKreator]

Originally Posted by ECV56_Guevara

Sorry Sturm, the original google translation is ok. It talks about the universal understanding of maths. There s no need of translation where we talk about numbers.
Los numeros no tienen "idioma".
Y si, Sturm , es una de las pocas veces que el google la pega. Saludos!

Se guevara que estaba bien, pero para que se de a entender que aunque quiera expresar el conocimiento de los libros, testimonios, datos etc... necesito un nivel mucho mayor de ingles, la idea es apoyar los datos con testimonios, pero me dare el trabajo uno de estos dias de postearlo S!

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

Look, Im not a english speaker, so its a little difficult to me explain many things, but I speak spanish, if someone could translated would be great, I have 3 books were you see all Fockes FM all wrong, but WRONG, Doras, TAs, Antons, etc...

Although the forums are in English there are a great many speakers of all different languages. Not myself but numbers are numbers and explanations can be translated.

For the Yak-9UT armament and ammo corrections I ran a couple of documents through Google translate from Russian to English. Different alphabet even. But the translator made it make enough sense to establish what they were saying and data is data...so it was "easy" enough after the documentation was tracked.

No matter what language... if you just pop over and say "Hey it's wrong" with nothing else. Magic isn't going to happen, on the other hand, something substantive would be really interesting.