pitot tube to measure speed and bernuoilli, aeronautics

[JG52Krupi]

Is that a real question or one you made up? (post 6)

I'm pretty sure the component you thinking of is not a pitot tube as it will always require a tube pointing into the wind to capture air flow and therefore a pressure reading.

[raaaid]

no i made it up but should have a solution using bernuilli i guess other than zero height column

man this is my eleventh year for a 3 year degree, i lack faith for what i study

you know like the emperors new clothes

[Redroach]

didn't read any of raaaid's postings at all... are they at least marginally reasonable? Or is it the usual "heeey I'm subtly annoying people and it's great fun even if nobody laughs at all" mentally disturbed stuff?

[JG52Krupi]

Clearer than usual but still in the realms of a meths abuser.

[conio]

[Redroach]

WOW! That outline is teh pure awsumness! I repeat, purely awesome!

[raaaid]

haha i got a zero out of ten in my last physics exam but i bet noone can solve this problem, make it a column of water so density is one:


a special pitot tube with both ends parallel to the flow of wind but oposite sense is in an ideal fluid at an speed of 1 m/s

what will be the height of the mercury(water)?

d*g*z+v*v*d+p=k

edit:

imagining a normal pitot tube in a fluid at 1 m/s answer would be:

1000*10*x+1000+1=1000*10*0+0+1
10000x+1001=1
10000x=1000
x=1/10
0.1m height of column of water