Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2011, 04:21 PM
Furio's Avatar
Furio Furio is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
col123 is quite right, how did anyone deduce 'big' wings = good gliding performance? every sailplane I know has high aspect ratio long and skinny wings, sounds to me like the 111 has an FM bug if it is gliding so well, those big wings should create huge amounts of induced drag.
He111 wing is not that “big”. It’s aspect ratio is 5.9, the Bf109 being pretty close at 6.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2011, 05:15 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Furio View Post
He111 wing is not that “big”. It’s aspect ratio is 5.9, the Bf109 being pretty close at 6.
Maybe so, but a typical sailplane aspect ratio is anywhere between 15 to 25 ish and have narrow chord, the 111 has a very wide chord that is what I mean by 'big', by no means a glider wing
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2011, 05:53 PM
Furio's Avatar
Furio Furio is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Maybe so, but a typical sailplane aspect ratio is anywhere between 15 to 25 ish and have narrow chord, the 111 has a very wide chord that is what I mean by 'big', by no means a glider wing
You’re right. What I mean is that the He111 has an average aspect ratio for WWII combat types, and this is consistent with an average l:d. Latest tests (edited post ≠ 12) by jf1981 really do show some suspicious numbers. One that looks odd to me is the same l:d at 160 km/h. (where minimum sink is registered) and at 200 km/h. Another is the bad performance of Ju88... Odd.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-15-2011, 08:31 PM
GnigruH GnigruH is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 129
Default

I love how this thread delivered.
I LAUGHED OUT LOUD reading it.
A guy reports something suspicious, then gets bashed a little too hard for not including his test results.
Some 'experts' respond with attitude like: 'you be noob, das game ist flawless', some include deep aero-dynamical evidence like: 'it has big wings, you noob'.
Priceless.

TBH I've seen aeroplanes flying quite good with no wings in this flawless game, nothing is going to surprise me after that.
I bet that after the game becomes playable more ppl will finally realize that fm is a bad joke in many many aspects.

Last edited by GnigruH; 05-15-2011 at 08:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.