Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Certificate (or expired cert)
ATPL / APL / CPL 33 15.21%
PPL 42 19.35%
GPL / MGPL 20 9.22%
SPL 8 3.69%
Other 9 4.15%
None 105 48.39%
Voters: 217. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 04-02-2011, 05:12 PM
kimosabi kimosabi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
I became a pilot in the vain hope that somebody else would want to feel my pants, sadly it seems chicks don't dig pilots that much........just money, and I'm affraid being a pilot isn't the well paid glamour job it used to be.
Taking them for a ride didn't work either?

Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 04-03-2011, 12:30 AM
Huncowboy Huncowboy is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by He111 View Post
I bet the dork pilots can out fly the real pilots.

He111.
LOL I bet you are right. I am flying an airbus for a living and I have no idea how to shoot those damn britts down. So far had 2 water landings and a crash landing within 3 missions. Ummm... and no kills. For now I will blame it on the frame rates This game will be fun in no time, just like the older IL series. I've played them all. I am so glad that this is finally out even if it needs work.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 04-03-2011, 03:39 AM
mpetrov mpetrov is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 11
Default

Fly an Aeroprakt A22 Foxbat ( or Valor as its known in the US).
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 04-06-2011, 03:57 PM
Sternjaeger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PE_Tigar View Post
I say go with the cheaper one, or if the price is the same, take the one with better avionics. You WILL appreciate a good HSI, glass cockpit or a GPS over the steam gauges when you get to do the IR, or when you get into some less then pleasant weather.

Piper's fuel cock is a nuisance (one more task, have to switch it left or right all the time), and due to the low wing takes less crosswind on landings. Also, in most low wing models you have to fiddle with the fuel pump on takeoff. etc. However, Piper usually has a more simple engine startup procedures (talk about the 172SP "three hands" startup) and tends to have less draught in the cockpit (real important in cold weather, trust me ). Newer Cessnas float quite a bit on landing, as they have a very low stalling speed. Pipers float less, but are easier to stall. On the other hand, you can hardly notice you've stalled a Piper (which can be dangerous), in a Cessna power-on stalls are quite dramatic, though harmless.

As with visibility - low wing means you don't see anything approaching you from below or opposite from the side you're turning to, high wing - the opposite. But for that reason high wing is better for "IFR" (I follow roads) navigation. Anyway, horses for courses - my favourite single engine now is a PA28R with a turbo engine, HSI and Garmin G530 - rather cheap to fly, pretty fast and fully IFR, and less complicated than, say, C-172RG which we have also in our flying club, which was my favorite before.

Both Cessna and Cherokee are docile, stable and forgiving airplanes. The differences are as above, but if I was making a choice it would come down to the two particular planes, and avionics especially.
Ditto, Cherokee is a fat ass thing, but again it's down to what you want to do with it (career as opposed to fun). I love steam gauges but that's just me and my fixation for vintage aviation, I went on a Cirrus with a complete glass cockpit and and I was shocked by the amount of info and cool stuff you can do today!
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 04-06-2011, 03:59 PM
Sternjaeger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R_Suppards View Post
Mk 5 with the glorious registration number of VH ASI. How did you go when you landed it? It is quite unforgiving of any mistake. Hardest landing I had in it was a cross wind landing with 30 knot at right angles to the runway.
30kts crosswind?! u r definitely madder than me mate!

I found it quite easy to land, it's a pretty forgiving machine (mind you, I'm used to Tiger Moths, so any other taildragger is a stroll in the park) and I love its visibility from the cockpit
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.