![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are there plans for MDS with RRR?
té mais tityus |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With SoW coming and making its debut,IL2 will leave the stage in a gran finale.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() IL2 got tone!! LOL Great job on the Bomb fusing department, i wouldn't be surpized if this part of the code is very soon part of COD as well ...( if it is not allready ) no RRR is a bummer indeed. Bravo Very Nice!!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Outstanding update TD, IL2_1946 has clearly got years of life left in it with you you guys bolstering the flyables list with gems like these. Congratulations and keep up the incredibly good work
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Refuel and Rearm are not a priority although there is certain value in these features so they might be included in 4.12.
FC
__________________
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry to say but for me there is still one feature missing. a manual opened Bombbay. All can be steered trough a stick or throttel, but you have "modern"art automatic bay doors???
What are the plans about this feature? You said ideas are welcomed, so here is my again ![]() Or have you ever seen F-117 like bay doors on a WW2 Bomber? best regards Martin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On a related note, it would be cool to have doors that get jammed or torn loose if flying too fast. Additionally, the Betty has no bomb-bay doors at all, and should probably be fixed.
Unrelated, but someone made a mod in which damaging hydraulic lines causes landing gear to fall. (Currently gear simply becomes inop - would be nice if flaps and other components could become inop as well). Could you guys also look at the DM of the Ki-21 and Ki-27? They seem unusually tough (not empirical, I know, but it is a noticeable trend). Planes like the R-10 are at the opposite end. Probably everything needs some adjustment, especially considering how old some models are, and from how many people they came. It's a wide spectrum and I'm sure the standards and notions of "toughness" have shifted dramatically over time. It would be nice to normalize everything, and make them more accurate. Last edited by Romanator21; 04-06-2011 at 08:36 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So thats were my donation for the PE-8 went nice job on that plane PSY!
Did you guys load it up to a modeling 3-D site for sales? like http://turbosquid.com/
__________________
71st Eagle Squadron www.anon6.com - Blogger on DCS Series 71st Mastiff's You-Tube " any failure you meet is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back " Asus||i7x5930k||16gb3200||GTX10808gb||ATX1200Corsa ir||CBTitanium7.1||Win10x64||TrackIr4Pro/ir||gladiator pro mkII||siatekpedals||X52Throttle||G15Keyboard/RazerMouse|| 32"LCD||2x7" lilliputs,1x9inc |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's a measure of the quality of TD's work that I'm looking more forward to their IL-2 patches than CoD.
Great that we finally have the TBD. Long overdue. All we need now is the Curtis SB2-C and Mitsubishi G3M, and we're all set in the Pacific as far as planes are concerned. Maybe the Japanese types that served in China might be included later (the Ki-36 "Ida" and Ki-51 "Sonia")? The Pe-8 and Il-4 look great. I really hope TD can find the time to face-lift the Bf-109, MiG-3, LaGG-3, Yak-1,3,7,and 9, and the Il-2 cockpits. The 109s and LaGGs (excluding the already nice La-5 and 7 pits, don't need to touch those!) aren't too bad, but the Yak and MiG pits are plain ugly. Especially the MiG. I know it's a long shot, but I frequently wish that someday we could see many - if not all - of the conspicuously absent ship types that served in the Pacific, both Allied and Japanese, and also including the Dutch destroyers, cruisers, and subs. Ok, I'm asking a lot now! ![]() Fantastic work as always, TD! ~S~ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|