![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was not commenting on the quality of the markings. The quality is great much better than previous versions, but as you stated the time frame for the markings is obviously wrong. Also desert camouflage is assigned to maps of North Africa and most of the Pacific Maps at least in previous versions so this could explain the choice of Torch insignia. There is no separate Pacific or Jungle camouflage setting as part of the game which could help.
Although the 4.09m versions of the US insignia for the Corsair Mk I were of less quality than with the 4.10.1 versions the 4.09m version did attempt to accurately display the proper insignia for the Corsair Mk I (P-400 & P-39N as USAAF) when selecting USN/USMC for the country. Maybe the powers to be in a future patch could change which markings display for the this aircraft based on time frame. My intent was to bring up the problem so that the powers to be might look at the issue. Can I take for instance the Dec 42 Solomons map (to accurately reflect the actually airfields of February 1943) and put the date of Jan 44 to get the six position blue circle and star insignia for USMC?
__________________
-)-MAILMAN- Last edited by -)-MAILMAN-; 03-29-2011 at 01:51 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't 'USN markings on RAF Corsairs' wrong at all? I don't get it.
EDIT: ah, reading in that other thread, I understand now: you want in fact a F4U-1 and so you were going for a compromise, using the Corsair MK.I. And you are complaining about the historical inaccuracy of your compromise. Well, a decent F4U-1 default skin for USN could indeed help to make your compromise looking less like a compromise.
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible Last edited by EJGr.Ost_Caspar; 03-29-2011 at 07:41 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
-)-MAILMAN- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The problem is that the stars & bars emblem is not possible in realistic dimensions with the marking system. That would require a rectangle with greather width than height ... and we have a square. This is also the reason dedicated US skins are available for certain types - the later insignia is on them in accurate dimensions.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well I don't pretend to know how the national insignia is applied to a particular skin when you turn markings on. In other words I don't know the mechanics of making it happen.
I do know that in 4.09m and earlier versions the blue circle and white star appeared when you turned "markings on" and was historically correct. This was more correct than what we have in the latest version and maybe we should go back to this. With 4.10.1 three different national markings appear depending what the date of the mission. The '42 & '43 markings are not historically correct and never appeared on the airplane. The fact that replies and explanations have been written is appreciated and I hope a solution to this problem get found and implemented.
__________________
-)-MAILMAN- Last edited by -)-MAILMAN-; 03-30-2011 at 11:31 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Maybe the same roundel and star that is default in '44 could be made to show for all dates for the Corsair Mk I when selecting USN/USMC.
__________________
-)-MAILMAN- |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|