Can we get some Official comment on the news from Russia?

[Nike-it]

Just for information, I ran the game several minutes ago on my working PC that is very weak, even below minimum reqs (P4 3,2GHz, 2gb RAM pc3200 and GT8800 512 mb at 1280x1024x32bit and Windows XP).
On lowest settings I got approximately 22 - 25 FPS in the tutorial. Later will try it much more powerful PC.

[Razorhead]

Thanks for the info. I guess we just have to test the optimal settings on our systems , and then judge about the game..

The most important is to have fun and enjoy the game. If the settings are or normal or medium doesn't really matter to me.

[1.JaVA_Sharp]

interesting. I'd like to see what settings you tweaked.

Originally Posted by Nike-it

Just for information, I ran the game several minutes ago on my working PC that is very weak, even below minimum reqs (P4 3,2GHz, 2gb RAM pc3200 and GT8800 512 mb at 1280x1024x32bit and Windows XP).
On lowest settings I got approximately 22 - 25 FPS in the tutorial. Later will try it much more powerful PC.

thanks mate...btw is there a chance epilepsy filter could be turned OFF in one of the patches?

[Nike-it]

Originally Posted by Tvrdi

thanks mate...btw is there a chance epilepsy filter could be turned OFF in one of the patches?

Officially I don't know now yet, but I personally think that it is possible.

[*Buzzsaw*]

Salute

Here is the game on lowest settings. Note, the external view of the aircraft is NOT what you will see of an enemy external when you are in the cockpit, you see a higher quality view, I assume one which will conform with the visuals you are seeing of your own cockpit.

[video]

[Nike-it]

The difference between the lowest settings for plane and normal one doesn't affect the frame rate at all, but the visual effect is very huge. See the screens attached (again, screens made on the very weak PC - P4 3,2GHz, 2gb RAM pc3200 and Geforce 8800GT 512 mb at 1280x1024x32bit and Windows XP)

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by Nike-it

The difference between the lowest settings for plane and normal one doesn't affect the frame rate at all, but the visual effect is very huge. See the screens attached (again, screens made on the very weak PC - P4 3,2GHz, 2gb RAM pc3200 and Geforce 8800GT 512 mb at 1280x1024x32bit and Windows XP)

Could you upload a video please?

[Matt255]

Originally Posted by Nike-it

The difference between the lowest settings for plane and normal one doesn't affect the frame rate at all

I don't quite get that.

You shown us three different screenshots with three different plane-detail settings i assume.

With the following FPS 25, 32, 43. How is 25 and 43 not a huge difference?

Maybe i'm reading this wrong, but on those screenshots, it's pretty obvious to see that the different settings have a huge impact on the framerate people are getting.

But other than that, if you want to convince people that CloD can run smoothly on a good system, please make a video. That's what people want to know.

[Nike-it]

Originally Posted by Matt255

I don't quite get that.

You shown us three different screenshots with three different plane-detail settings i assume.

With the following FPS 25, 32, 43. How is 25 and 43 not a huge difference?

Maybe i'm reading this wrong, but on those screenshots, it's pretty obvious to see that the different settings have a huge impact on the framerate people are getting.

But other than that, if you want to convince people that CloD can run smoothly on a good system, please make a video. That's what people want to know.

I maybe really wrong as my PC can't handle normal permanent framerate in any case. But if you look at the screens attached you will find that the difference between lowest setting and normal is not that big. Looks like smth is wrong with Hurricane.

Low settings


Medium settings