![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just to ad: the additional headarmor and even the additional windscreen armour was also possible with the early, more rounded canopy...
IF the mineshells are available in the amunition selection of the E-3 i would be very surprised, not to say dissapointed... And btw, who would fly without them! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Haha, that's true. Why would you be disappointed, though? Whether you'd call the aircraft E-3 or the E-4 in game would be dependent upon which ammo it was firing, it's not like the game considers alterations to the recoil system of the gun - it doesn't really matter in game since it's just a label for two aircraft with differences in the guns which have no practical difference in the game in terms of separating the two types. If mission builders are able to choose which ammo types are available in their mission to indirectly choose whether the player flies an aircraft with MG FF or MG FF/M - and they definitely should be able to
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don't think it would be that bad. Better than leaving the E-4 out entirely. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Its weird how the usual lufty whiners don't seem to be concerned about that, yet they are concerned about which type of 20mm cannon they get (and upset it's not the better of the two). |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Mom, some kid at school called me a "Lufty Whiner".
Now's the point that I start thinking about if the Dedicated Server has restrictions on aircraft slots, ammo, types, etc... If I remember correctly, it does. Simple enough for online mission builders to limit numbers, etc... Spit II and E4/N limited to a few per side, for example. Quote:
S! Gunny Last edited by TUSA/TX-Gunslinger; 03-01-2011 at 02:11 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
my point is simple.
surely having a plane that fought in much larger numbers (the E1) in the Battle of Britain is more important than other sub types (E4N) which fought in much lesser numbers, if you want an as accurate as possible BoB (although having all the variants would be nice). yes/no? Last edited by fruitbat; 03-01-2011 at 02:18 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are more than 1 version of the Bf109E? LOL! All look the same to me!
__________________
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
i guess we all here have the same opinion: That the CoD 109 , at least at release, will be the E-3 is 'strange'. It was there and had action but was by far not the most common variant. E-1 and E-4 would have been the much more logical choice. And perhaps more interesting for a Luftwaffe fighter campaign. First you have to fly the E-1 and later get the upgrade to the canon plane. Even more strange is that 1C already have the MG-FF/M modelled for the Bf110C-4 & -7 ?!?! my, very personal, wishlist for the 109 in CoD would have been: E-1 & -/B with DB601A-1 old canopy , no headarmour E-3 & -/B with DB601A-1 old canopy , no headarmour E-4 & -/B with DB601Aa with newer canopy and headarmour E-4/N with DB601N with newer canopy and headarmour would have been from plane to plane a nice improvemnt in a pilotcareer. And for online, COOP designers have no proplems to restrict the numbers ![]() But ok, the axis side will get a lot (in comparison to the RAF) of flyable bombers ![]() and dont forgett , there will still be the mighty G.50 ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks!
Great list. Understand all. S! Gunny |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maybe they left something for the payware addons (*wink*)
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|