Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1621  
Old 11-23-2010, 07:43 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default Clouds/smoke/dust/fog

Three ideas for some patch in the future:

1) Multiple cloud layers, which can be defined in the QMB/FMB. Ideally, you should be able to set base height for each layer, as well as maximum top and bottom level, degree of opaqueness, percentage of cover and rain/snow effects. For example, you could, say, set 90% cloud cover from 300 meters to 2,000 meters with light rain, with clear skies above that to 10,000 meters where you encounter wispy clouds 20% coverage, with peaks up to 12,000 meters. Fog is modeled by creating low level full cover semi-opaque clouds.

2) Placeable clouds/dust/smoke/etc. In the FMB, you could place areas of cloud/whatever on the map, as defined above. By changing the color of the clouds you could get dust clouds (like sandstorms or those generated by big desert battles) or massive areas of smoke (caused by massive fires on the ground, or the pollution which hung over all big cities in the days when most heat and power was generated using coal).

3) The degree of dust kicked up by aircraft/vehicles varies depending on weather, map and surface. For example, a plane taking off from a concrete runway in moist temperate conditions isn't likely to kick up much dust, while a plane taking off from a sandy landing strip is likely to produce huge clouds of the stuff.
  #1622  
Old 11-23-2010, 12:20 PM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default

Dear DAIDALOS TEAM hi i tink the FIAT CR42 back not have a just dimension and measuring.
loock whit attenction this photo.
il2fb 2010-11-23 13-47-24-76.jpg
il2fb 2010-11-23 13-47-11-07.jpg
the hump back according to my analysis is very wide and very high.
this is original photo.

Pict0024.jpg
imagesCAI0DZAF.jpg
RA%2025.jpg
  #1623  
Old 11-23-2010, 12:22 PM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default

profile cr 42
Fiat-3.jpg
7.jpg
fiat_cr42_lw-33975.jpg
  #1624  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:33 PM
SPITACE SPITACE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: england
Posts: 95
Default flyable B25 H??

hi all is there any chance to have the B25 H flyable using the B25 J cockpit in the 4.10 update?? the cockpits must have been the same
  #1625  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:36 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPITACE View Post
hi all is there any chance to have the B25 H flyable using the B25 J cockpit in the 4.10 update?? the cockpits must have been the same
To my knowledge there were differences between the two types so the answer must be no.
  #1626  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:41 PM
SPITACE SPITACE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: england
Posts: 95
Default

to bad about B25H maybe a flyable "ju88c"
  #1627  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:48 PM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default

Fiat-3.jpg

wrong desine please daidalos team corect the just desine of _FIAT cr 42
  #1628  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:48 PM
Krt_Bong Krt_Bong is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
To my knowledge there were differences between the two types so the answer must be no.
The one major difference was the lack of dual controls which were in many cases re-introduced as a field modification and a few less instruments, the cockpit we have for the B-25J could be used without really modifying that anything else that was different in the cockpit would not be in the view of the pilot.
  #1629  
Old 11-23-2010, 02:53 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

It's against the agreement between Daidalos and Maddox Games just to "recycle" existing cockpits. The answer is still no to that solution.
  #1630  
Old 11-23-2010, 04:28 PM
Krt_Bong Krt_Bong is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
It's against the agreement between Daidalos and Maddox Games just to "recycle" existing cockpits. The answer is still no to that solution.
I'm not arguing with that understand but would it be safe to say that in the entire sim with so many of the same general type that no part of any original cockpit was recycled from one Spit or 109 to another? I mean in the spirit of the said agreement we wouldn't want a B-25 cockpit in a B-17 anyway but a B-25 to another B-25? Would that be forbidden?
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.