![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What exactly is 'cool' about a weapon who's only feasible use is against large civilian populations?
There will no doubt be continuing debate about the legitimacy of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, along with questions about the indiscriminate attacks on civilians on all fronts during WW 2. I don't think that 'cool' is however an appropriate phrase to use about any of them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|