![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I hadn't realised you'd deleted your last post, Buzpilot. I've edited mine to avoid confusion.
The percentage figure is only an approximation - the relationship isn't totally linear, and in any case only holds under standard atmospheric conditions. None of the stock maps reproduce this, though I believe that Smolensk is the closest. There is more to high altitude performance than just the IAS/TAS relationship in any case, and I don't think there is a systematic error in IL-2 due to any miscalculation. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And many planes in real life ww2 had their best combat altitudes above 20 000 feet, but nobody makes missions at those altitudes in IL2, not just because it takes a while to get there, imho . Edit; I don't think this is a error, but maybe too simplified, and after comparing lots of planes in il2compare, I was amazed of the amount of data in flightmodels, and it probably would get even better with more advanced IAS calculation. Last edited by Buzpilot; 08-21-2010 at 02:38 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|