Example experiment physic crash.

[Lucas_From_Hell]

Originally Posted by Xilon_x

But I want to emphasize that war is war, war knows all kinds of violence.
I want you to realize that war is war.

An Italian trying to show Russian developers that war is war. Wake up, mate. It's easy to find someone whose grandfather or grandmother (or even father and mother) fought in the war, got wounded in the war and died in the war. You don't seem to realize the scale of the conflict.

People don't need you to remind them how war is, they've had enough war already, trust me.

The developers and other members of this forum know war is war, we read books about wars and we are fully aware of how horrible and cruel war is.

Can you please stop trying to show us that a circle is round and a square has four sides now?

[bf-110]

Originally Posted by major_setback

I'll explain why people are upset.

There is a tradition on the forums (this one and Ubisoft's) of not posting any offensive material. There are children who come here for one thing.
To show a film of a plane that crashes into a crowd killing 67 people is not exactly the best way to make a point about making realistic crash-models.
It's why people get angry. To most people it is very distasteful and disrespectful, to say the least.
I think that if films like this have ever been shown before then it has been done in a spirit of compassion, where the horror of the event is the point that is being made.
I know that I can't watch them without thinking about all those injured or killed.

That´s why all the flaming...
Well,you may call me sob,but I didn´t get seriously impressed with the last video.Since,no dead bodies or injured people are show (apparently).Crashes should never happen in airshows,spoil the event and scare the crowd...
The first video is cool,the 3d,but the effects not.

[BadAim]

I love the ignore list now, it's my favorite feature all of a sudden.

[brando]

Originally Posted by bf-110

That´s why all the flaming...
Well,you may call me sob,but I didn´t get seriously impressed with the last video.Since,no dead bodies or injured people are show (apparently).Crashes should never happen in airshows,spoil the event and scare the crowd...
The first video is cool,the 3d,but the effects not.

It's just clear that you have little imagination and no ability to empathize with a tragedy and its consequences. That's sad, but it doesn't qualify you as a son-of-a-bitch I'm afraid. You'll have to try harder.

Brando

[Xilon_x]

dear brando i have another crash important video but i not put in because the peoples of this forum not like it.

mosth peoples not like crash.....but Sow have bombs and war plane.
Mosth peoples not like violence ....but Sow is a WW2 simulation game.
Mosth peoples not like my post and my idea.....but Sow have mosth idea and most alternative idea.

ok i ask at all peoples of this forum if you don't like crash
if you don't like violence
if you don't like war
if you don't like story
if you don't like real war real simulation and real violence and goore or sad

BECAUSE not RETURN to play to FSX?
FSX is only fly
FSX no WAR
FSX no violence no bombs no strategy no crash no real atmosfere of WW2
FSX is only flight no adrenaline no emotion no pure efect.

WAR is WAR and Sow is Simulation of WAR the WAR have all type the violence strategy and tattical tecnology.
ok if SoW is only Flight simulator i not buy it because i like to play whit all peoples of this world to real simulation ww2 and not fiction or fake.
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 is Fantastic and i like play a war to another peoples whit another nation to war game.
SOW is the future now i wait this WW2 simulation from 1C company and i have pacience.

[Igo kyu]

Originally Posted by Xilon_x

WAR is WAR and Sow is Simulation of WAR the WAR have all type the violence strategy and tattical tecnology.
ok if SoW is only Flight simulator i not buy it because i like to play whit all peoples of this world to real simulation ww2 and not fiction or fake.
IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 is Fantastic and i like play a war to another peoples whit another nation to war game.
SOW is the future now i wait this WW2 simulation from 1C company and i have pacience.

Yes, maybe, but....

There are rules and regulations about violence, and obscenity and violence. If the rules say that kids under 18 can't buy a game with violence, then that means a lot of sales can be lost if a game includes violence. Sure some kids have parents who will buy games for them that they aren't allowed to buy for themselves, but a lot more kids just miss out, and those are lost potential sales.

When people complain about kids playing adult rated games, gamers say the fault is with the parents who buy the games for the kids, and I think the gamers are right. Which means kid sales for adult games are rightly lost. 1c probably (I don't strictly speaking know this, but it's easy to guess) cannot afford the lost sales of SoW being an adults only game.

[Xilon_x]

Igo Kiu.

those children who play IL-2 Sturmovik 1946?
how many children playing FSX?
how many kids playing at f16 falcon?
those children who play lock-on or blak shak?

my answer'................ very few.
child prefers a more 'play an arcade game than a simulator.
The simulator for a child and boring, there are many things to learn.
Children want the fun direct children not studying books or manuals to learn a simulator.

you remember the series of GTA games? (Gran Theft Auto). was prohibited to anyone under 18.
GTA has lost market but has gained much more '.
most adults buying GTA for their sun.

To IL-2 example I play online 'meeting for adult professionals or even real pilots and rarely play online with a child-IL2 Sturmovik.

The average age 'for the play-2 was 19 28 or 30 or 32 even 60 or 40.

[Xilon_x]

real spitfire crash.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-sp2...eature=related

[swiss]

Originally Posted by Xilon_x

ok i ask at all peoples of this forum if you don't like crash
if you don't like violence
if you don't like war
if you don't like story
if you don't like real war real simulation and real violence and goore or sad

"LIKE" violence?
"LIKE" war?

Boy, you're are so nuts.

As men, we like action: fire, flashes, booms & big guns.

But IL2 is just a game; if you shoot somebody down, he can respawn within seconds - this not going to happen in real life.
In real life you can touch and even smell death, there is a big fat red line between games and reality, obviously retards like you can not see it.
Ppl like you are also the reason governments want to ban those killer games.

And there is decency, what do think will happen if one of the relatives of those victims reads your post in this context?

Still don't understand?
Let me help you:
You CAN post war pictures all day long as long as we don't have to see shattered bodies.
It still is not really ok, but anyway.

You CANNOT post of pictures of accidents where civilians died.
For instance:
- Ramstein
- Lockerbie
- 9/11
- Concorde/Paris
...
Do you get it?

Also, if Oleg gave a flying fu¢k about your linked videos you'd have his email so you can contact him directly.
DO YOU?

No? Hmmm...


PS: I wonder if you ever had contact with bodies? Did you? Or have you even served in military?

[Xilon_x]

IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 CRASH TEST. What is your point?
What is your observation? What is your coment?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEAd4und0dU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5Wg6...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um8Ex...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni47R...eature=related