Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 03-27-2010, 08:11 AM
Freycinet Freycinet is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 13th Hsqn Protos View Post
Doofus.
Now anyone that posts an opinion contrary to yours is a troll .....
Nobody takes you serious in here or ever will again... You asked for it, you got it.

Too bad you have sullied the good name of the 13th Hsqn. I think everybody in here will think of you when they see it mentioned, which is really too bad for the good people that flew honourably in the squadron.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 03-27-2010, 09:25 AM
ChrisDNT ChrisDNT is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie View Post
It's a WWII Combat Flight Sim not a WWII Tree Sim
Yes.

I'ts an aviation sim, no need no model realistically anything except the aircrafts.

Please, no landscape at all (good for fps)
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 03-27-2010, 10:26 AM
kendo65 kendo65 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by major_setback View Post
Can you explain how it will be 'alright'?
Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but I can not see more than a couple of native British trees in that listing! Most trees are American and would look totally out of place!!!


There isn't even an English oak!!

This means lots of development time is needed for them if they haven't already been modelled. I hope Oleg isn't trusting that there will be enough default trees in that program to suit SoW:BoB, because it looks as though there aren't.
There are more European trees, including an English Oak, in the 4.2 version of Speedtree - their home page lists version 5 by default.

To see them click the 4.2 box top left on http://www.speedtree.com/trees/

Unfortunately, I don't think their English Oak is one of their best!

If Oleg's reading, I'd like to put in a request for some of their Granny Smith apple trees - should be just coming into their best around September

-----

OK. Nix the apple trees! Before I get pulled up for incorrect research - apparently they're not native English and they come into season later than September. Got to watch your back when posting on these forums

If only SpeedTree did a nice Cox's Orange Pippin or Laxton's fortune

Damn this game and damn Wikipedia!!!

Last edited by kendo65; 03-27-2010 at 11:03 AM. Reason: Incorrect apple information!
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 03-27-2010, 11:13 AM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I agree that the pics of the 'typical english village' are far from perfect i.e roof angles too sharp etc, but is this amount of detail really relevant, to me the most important detail is what it all looks like from the air, and if the buildings/trees at airfields are in much higher detail then that would be a considerable bonus because obviously you will be seeing a whole lot more of these.
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 03-27-2010, 11:35 AM
mark@1C mark@1C is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 51
Default

The ground environment still need enhance, the impression of artificial work still comes to me immediately, again. It is so impressive that I begin to believe it may well be done in this way intentionally, considering the purpose of optimizing, and we do not spent most of our time on the ground in this game. The engine itself looks like using a cartoon rendering technology while the groundscape open out to me. But the cockpit samples are really fine. I don't know why the staff/or the engine can not carry this FINE into the groundscape.
The first three screenshots look like some place in the fairy-tale, an artificial landscape. It has been said before, looks like a real aeroplane flying over a LEGO city, a Disney theme park. It's hard to tell what's wrong, because they are nice as some people said, in a sense. But the feeling of something wrong does exist, it is not the correct atomsphere fit for the war, it's not a battlefiled, it's a place for afternoon tea...
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 03-27-2010, 11:41 AM
kendo65 kendo65 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 908
Default

Ah, Tree UK - surely the perfect person to put us right on these matters! ... or is your name just an empty boast

Hesitated to say this before as I'm sure those shots are thrown together WIP demos but, for me what was most off was the positioning of the trees and houses. Looked like a random scatter. Needs to be more integrated around roads, fields, etc. (See real photo a few pages back.). Hedgerows will help when they are put in.

Again, maybe a bit OTT to criticize, . Suspect they are already aware of this.

Last edited by kendo65; 03-27-2010 at 11:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 03-27-2010, 12:02 PM
imaca imaca is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark@1C View Post
It's hard to tell what's wrong, because they are nice as some people said, in a sense. But the feeling of something wrong does exist, it is not the correct atomsphere fit for the war, it's not a battlefiled, it's a place for afternoon tea...
Im beginning to suspect this is the reason WOPs overly dark and grungy look is popular with some.
It seems many people can't get their head around the fact that "battlefields" and "afternoon tea" take place in the same time space continuum.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 03-27-2010, 12:23 PM
KOM.Nausicaa KOM.Nausicaa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 290
Default

The impression of "wrong" arises because you look in close up at chunks of generic created landscapes. This can hardly be avoided - after all it's a flight sim.

The problem with trees and other vegetation is, simply said, that they are very hard to be done right in 3D. It's an insane amount of work to do a good looking tree (from afar, but even more so from up close) in 3D, and it becomes very quickly polygon hell. Unacceptable polygon numbers for a game that has to render things in real time. Hence the popularity of optimized libraries like Speedtree or other tree generators. There are lots around for just that purpose. I am quite frankly rather impressed by those trees - they look really convincing for a tree that is obviously heavily simplified in polygon complexity. It should be no problem to put other species onto the map. The question is just how many Oleg is willing to buy for diversity purposes. (and maybe they are already there, you just don't see them on the selected screenshots).
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 03-27-2010, 12:29 PM
KOM.Nausicaa KOM.Nausicaa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 290
Default

PS: I forgot to mention that Oleg and team have without doubt to modify the trees after purchase. I am fairly certain they are not usable as they are "out of the box". They just deliver a good template. So it still stays work.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 03-27-2010, 12:50 PM
RedToo's Avatar
RedToo RedToo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark@1C View Post
... it is not the correct atomsphere fit for the war, it's not a battlefiled, it's a place for afternoon tea...
The long hot summer of 1940. England on the ground was for many people a place for afternoon tea. The battle was going on up above. Many RAF pilots commented on this contrast after parachuting out of the battle. Until the Germans switched priorites and began the blitz the Battle of Britain was in the air not on the ground and unless you lived close to an aerodrome you were not directly affected.

RedToo.
__________________


43 Squadron.

My 'Waiting for Clodo' thread: http://tinyurl.com/bqxc9ee
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.