Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-19-2010, 06:54 PM
virre89 virre89 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 185
Default

Everything still ontrack for pre-october release ?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-19-2010, 07:55 PM
bhunter2112 bhunter2112 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sunny-Warm- Hawaii
Posts: 102
Default

Movies only please !
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-19-2010, 07:55 PM
Ian_Guerrero Ian_Guerrero is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Madrid
Posts: 15
Default

Oleg, if the release of the SIM is not for this year, perhaps when completed Simulator, vision in monitors 3D is an industry standard.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-19-2010, 10:31 PM
Lonely Ringer Lonely Ringer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 15
Default

Most likely got to be fried chicken , problem with most " portable " radar is heat build up , burning out the thing , on board ship is no problem using sea water to cool the apparatus, I know, I worked on a ton of cooling pumps for ships radar for USN in ship yard Long Beach. so portable may have a shut down period or be of such low power as to be only usefull to short range ? Todays stuff is so effecient that this is less of a problem. and Airbone uses the cold outside to keep its cool.... just a thought
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-19-2010, 11:04 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Lancelot View Post
Didn´t know such things existed for detecting aircraft, i thought that detection was done by radar, and the good old fashion eyeball, on the ground or in the air.
They existed since WWI in fact. I have some nice pics of those early attempts ... make me laugh each time though ...

Insuber
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-20-2010, 01:26 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

With all these different type of detection gear at our disposal, I keep on thinking that it would be great to have a player manable 'plotting table'. Where the location and altitude of the various contacts would be displayed.

A member of a on-line squadron could use teamspeak (or a built in Radio Communications???) to vector his squadron members onto the enemy contacts. Of course the historical accuracy and limitations of the various detection devices would need to be programmed and as the various devices are located and destroyed by the attacking planes those stations would not be able to send in any more plots!


I know one person wouldn't be flying but they would be able to co-ordinate their teams efforts.

It would also give a real reason for finding and taking out the listening posts, other than points!

Cheers and thanks for the updates.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-20-2010, 02:05 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
a player manable 'plotting table'
If you want 100% authenticity, it should probably be 'womanable'. This would certainly add a lot to the experience. One for third-party software, if not in the initial sim.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-20-2010, 02:28 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
If you want 100% authenticity, it should probably be 'womanable'. This would certainly add a lot to the experience. One for third-party software, if not in the initial sim.
100% correct, now where can a bloke buy a WAF uniform......

Did I just think that or type it??????? Hmmmmm! donuts!

cheers!

Edit! - Could be a great way to get our spouses involved in the sim!!!

Last edited by Skoshi Tiger; 02-20-2010 at 02:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-20-2010, 02:30 AM
FS~Lewis's Avatar
FS~Lewis FS~Lewis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 58
Default

On reading of Battle of Britain engagements I find that a lot of spitfire/hurricane pilots complained of having to disengage because of oil and debris from the luftwaffe aircraft when they were chasing from directly behind. Some found it so bad they were forced to land simply because they couldn't see well enough to carry the fight....

Will this be replicated in the new game?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-20-2010, 03:22 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
now where can a bloke buy a WAF uniform......
Um, WAAF to be exact. I have a suspicion that the WAAFs may have had more effect on the BoB than historians have acknowledged - and no, this isn't feminist revisionism. On the contrary, I suspect that the presence of female voices on R/T may have had a significant effect on morale, not least because whoever was responsible for WAAF uniform understood the workings of the minds of young adults of both sexes, and how dressing women up in 'male' attire made them more sexually alluring...

Sorry, I'm letting my anthropological studies get in the way here. What I meant to say is: Oleg make it authentic, give us WAAFs.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.