![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but the propeller had metal blades, and I think the Mk.IIa later got the slightly longer spinner.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Now for my original question... Without taking a guess, what defines this picture as occurring during the Battle of France? Hurricanes were definitely shot down over France after the Battle of Britain. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It seem's possible that this aircraft was in use by the axis prior to its demise. This of course is based on the lack of raf markings...just saying
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
(quote)
This picture of an RAF Hurricane Mk 1 shot down in the Battle of France ( probably May 1940) I was just wondering how you reached this conclusion (battle of France), did the first photo also have writing on it's back, if so, could you post an img of it, thanks
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First photo had nothing on the back. But there are similarities with the second photo.
As regards the first photo, the lack of RAF markings on the fuselage,fin and wings make it unlikely that it flew from England in 1941/2. And the countryside is very much French. I'm sure that there is a lot that happened during the Battle of France that is not in the Text Books. And this applies to perhaps all historical periods. That is why photos such as these are so interesting. Best Regards, MB_Avro. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do you know who's writing is on the back? By that, Is it the guy who took the photo or is someone who bought the photo postwar and wrote down what they thought?
I ask because I have friends who have been scammed on photos before. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You just have to be very careful and vet your sources well. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It would not be possible to remove the national markings without removing the fabric of the fuselage and fin. They were painted on. Souvenir hunters had to cut away the fabric. There has been no cutting in the first photo. Therefore, in my opinion the national markings for a reason as yet unkown were not applied. And yes, it's possible that the writing on the rear could be faked. But I don't see that either of the photos themselves are faked. Unless of course someone has rebuilt two damaged Hurricanes recently ![]() Best Regards, MB_Avro. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you look very closely at the first photo, you can just make out the circle of the former national marking, it appears a lighter color compared to the rest of the nearby area. It seems to me that it was painted over for what ever reason.
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The fabric is removed from the fuselage and the vertical stabilizer (fin?) is not exposed in the film. I can only make out the silhouette with no details on the v. stab. It looks like it has 6 gun bays on the right wing too. How are you ruling out that they are not outboard gun bays? Last edited by Crumpp; 12-24-2009 at 02:30 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|