![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You would be incorrect about the 109s behing heavy on the stick since it hit the shelves. I think it was 4.04 that introduced the cement elevator. Regardless of references most other planes in the game don't have this problem. If it's supposed to be modling accuracy then I would ask the same from you. What references were used to support the idea of heavy controls at certain speeds. I can't find any so far. Most of what I have seen said it had excellent handling through out the entire flight regime but then again these aren't tests. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a bug reporting thread, not a flight model whine (even if that whine may be justified) thread. Take the argument elsewhere fellas.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hood I am a DT member.
Capt Stubbing try ANY of Eric Browns or the RAF's evaluations of the 109. There are numerous discussions of all 109 variants and elevator pressures and pitch response. Get a copy of Wings of the Luftwaffe by Eric Brown or Augsberg Eagle by William Green which contains numerous reproductions of RAF evaluations. Another good source is Peter Caygill's "Flying to the limit Testing World War II Single engine fighter aircraft". Messerschmitt BF109 at war by Armand van Ishoven also contains large junks of RAF evaluation reports describing BF109 control forces etc. Just about every single evaluation of the 109 makes reference to heavy elevator loads. Last edited by IvanK; 10-08-2009 at 08:54 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please explain about what to the 5000 or so Germans that flew the 109 in WW2 , and Oleg bases 109 on a brit that never even flew it in combat ?
Me 109 G-6: Me109 was almost a dream come true for a pilot. Good controllability, enough speed, excelent rate of climb. The feel of the controls were normal except when flying over 600km/h - some strength was needed then. - Erkki O. Pakarinen, Finnish fighter pilot, Finnish Air Force trainer. Source: Hannu Valtonen, "Me 109 ja Saksan sotatalous" (Messerschmitt Bf 109 and the German war economy), ISBN 951-95688-7-5. Well 1/3 faster than what we now have in Olegs IL2 . HOPE you will be doing better in BOB !! Last edited by JG27_brook; 10-08-2009 at 10:18 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Go and read the Evaluations then come back, they are a little more technical than the narratives you quote
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe we should be basing the spit on German reports with that logic
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most of the evaulations are quite complimentary on the 109 in a number of areas in handling etc .... but as you say these were written by a "brit that never even flew it in combat" ....so should we discard these nice bits as well ? Just about every source available both Allied and axis is used in an attempt to make the in game aeroplane as accurate as possible.
You are being silly Brook. Make the effort read the reports, it might alter viewpoint though I doubt it. Last edited by IvanK; 10-09-2009 at 12:50 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
B
__________________
Another home-built rig: AMD FX 8350, liquid-cooled. Asus Sabretooth 990FX Rev 2.0 , 16 GB Mushkin Redline (DDR3-PC12800), Enermax 1000W PSU, MSI R9-280X 3GB GDDR5 2 X 128GB OCZ Vertex SSD, 1 x64GB Corsair SSD, 1x 500GB WD HDD. CH Franken-Tripehound stick and throttle merged, CH Pro pedals. TrackIR 5 and Pro-clip. Windows 7 64bit Home Premium. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Also, pilot accounts really shouldn't be turned into performance data. The data collected when these pilots test aircraft under controlled conditions are much better than making a plane do 600km/h level based on "X" pilot's account. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|