Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsausage
Very simple.
No matter if they are protype tanks, The king tiger is still better. It has the best gun mounted on a tank.
Centurion can't win against the KT unless it shoots it from the side. But most decent tanks can kill a king tiger by doing that.
Centurion got a crappy gun compare to the KT and its armor is not as good. Its basicly buildt for flanking tanks like king tigers.
Turtle just can't beat a king tiger. Even tho turtle got better armor then the king tiger the KT still got like twice as good gun. Turtle is basicly an elefant with a shitty gun and its really slow.
Its only the t-29 that is close to being as powerfull as the KT. Tho KTs gun is still slightly better.
Jagdtigers are excellt for dealing with T-29s because they can just drive up to em and shoot em without even risking of being penetrated. Or just get a Sturm tiger and kill it with one shot.
So if KT was cheaper it would be OP and it would be even more late game KT spam.
|
Thats rubbish,read the description of the Centurion tank on the game itself,if it came against german panthers & tigers they would have stood no chance,also the turtle had 217mm penetration,162mm for centurion,you might say that the centurion may struggle vs the king tiger,but the centurion cost 76 compared to 120 for king tiger,so the likelyhood of you buying one,if that,isnt likely is it,& a turtle which can easily knock out a Kingtiger is 95 cost compared to KT,my point being they should cost nearer the same amount,not such a big difference cost wise.
Also,remember a Tiger costs 62,a panther cost 70,only 6 less than a tank which the game itself says in a dual both would lose vs centurion,so why such a big gap cost wise between KingTiger,Jagdtiger & centurion or turtle is i think another important point.