![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As others said, the problem is not unique to 190s. However, the cases involving 190s stick out in my memory.
A key finding myself and others made, was that when shooting from close to directly behind the 190, it is much less sensitive to hits than from other angles. It often absorbed 50+ .50s and still kept flying. I remember a few cases online with more than 100 .50 hits from 6 o'clock (using gunstat before and after), and the prick continued to speed get away. Whilst there is no magical number of bullets that should bring down a plane, it just seemed far too common to be unable to drop a 190 with lots of hits from directly behind, whilst it wasn't too hard to knock them out with snap shots from other angles.
__________________
DIY uni-joint / hall effect sensor stick guide: http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/cont...ake-a-joystick |
|
|