FM's the State of Play with empasis on Climb performance.

[Robo.]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

No, I am saying the relative performance is correct. The specific performance is off but not outside the realm of possibility.

I repeat that there would be no problem with the performance being correct relative to each other, yet slightly off by the same margin from the reference graphs. This is not the case, unfortunately.

In my opinion, the models should be as close to the reference charts for standard atm. conditions and then affected by actual atmospheric settings on each map. There would be no problem with that, that's how it worked in old Il-2. I am sure it is possible to get the FMs more accurate than this.

You're stating that everything os OK and it's the atmospheric settings of the map (do we know what that is btw?) and the testing method, everybody else sees the FMs are not something to be proud of from the devs perspective.

I really suggest you guys give them aircraft a spin and share your findings with us.