
04-25-2008, 11:40 PM
|
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Former_Older
raaaid, you don't have a reputation as being a "bad person". I've never seen you say anything bad to anyone; in fact this "you don't deserve me" business is the harshest thing I've ever seen you post
You *do* have a reputation for having not thought through ideas and using shaky principles to 'prove' them, though...this has been shown, for years, at UbiSoft and, according to you actually, on various physics forums. You rush through your concepts, and you don't consider all parameters. That's a big part of what you've shown over seven years of your study
I did not make that situation come to pass; you did. I'm sorry you didn't make good science on your many ideas, but it's the facts and no matter how sorry I am, it doesn't change that your ideas are usually based on flawed principles or else fail to take critical things into account. Even when you're not talking about sim applications.
Personally after the first dozen or so of these ideas of yours I stopped taking you seriously in any way. I just can't do it, I can't consider what you're suggesting as being relevant to the actual application you want in the sim. That's my experience over the years. I haven't seen anything from you that tells me that your ideas are achieving anything that we can't already have, or else trade one undesirable situation for a different but new one. I don't know how many years that is, but it's easily five.
I don't think you're a bad person; I think your ideas are flawed, and I think that's why they never seem to work out
|
Thanks Former_Older! I'm new around here and I was wondering this myself: now I know better.
|