Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

[Glider]

Kurfurst
It is a shame that you concentrate on throwing accusations around but don't reply to any questions or supply any evidence.
Whatever you may think I have always supplied papers to support my positions, and often one will support another. The papers are often copies of originals from the NA and are complete. I do not rely on unsubstantiated postings as being the definitive line, neither do I ignore the other persons view. If there is a contridiction I try to find the more accurate path.
Wherever possible I give access to everyone the links and encourage them to make up their own minds examples include the pilots notes and the War Cabinet Minutes.

I do not claim to have a perfect case, but a strong one whereas yours is at best weak supported mainly by bluster.

I stand by my case and the evidence put forward to support it.

Your case stands on two main items,
1) the pre war objective of 16 fighter squadrons and 2 bomber squadrons
2) Pips posting,

All I and others have asked is for you to support any part of Pips posting not even all of it with some documentation, some official record. On the 16 + 2 supply anything that shows that the roll out of 100 Octane was limited to the 16 + 2.
Tragically we are still awaiting your evidence to support anything, anything at all and all you can turn to is bluster and accusation.

As I said I stand by my case, am happy to let the evidence support it and let people decide on the evidence for and against the use of 100 Octane