Will SoW be boring and superficial?

[DK-nme]

Hi Feathered and everybody else.

What a great and fantastic idea. If what you originally wrote and suggested in this thread could be implemented in the game, on-line as well as single player, it would become more of a dynamic campaign game, than the static il-2 game – on-line gaming can be a bit boring from time to time (identical objectives on different maps).

I imagine, after having read your thread (I got inspired), that 1 or 2 (or perhaps multiple) players could choose to fly secret missions (other missions than the usual bomber and fighter-sweeps, provided on-line pt.).
These different missions could be photo-recon (gather intell.) missions or the like over enemy territory, much like what feathered suggested, and if handled correctly, thus unlock new and more ‘hidden’ objectives (multiple objectives on each map).

The ‘hidden’ objectives could also be hidden to the enemy forces and should be very difficult to complete (an alternative, to the main objectives), but by completing these new ‘hidden’ objectives, one could simply win the map.

The ‘hidden’ objectives (type and position) could be chosen and placed randomly by the ‘program’ (the game), so that no 2 missions would be alike.

(Hopefully, you all get my point) – again, a very original, interesting and inspiring post…


DK-nme