![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guys, please don't get personal. Not everyone can subscribe to the same opinion and not everyone has the same sources or values each source equally.
Let's ask to have both high and low octane versions and then we can use whatever we like in our missions, without infringing on the ability of others to do the same. I try not to point fingers, but in this case both "camps" are so evenly matched in doing this that i think no harm will come from it, everybody's guilty of this behaviour to an extent. What behaviour? The "It's not good enough for me if i get the tools to recreate what i think is historically correct. I want these to be the only tools available so everyone else will do what i think is right, so that i never run the risk of flying in an unfavorable environment when going online and messing up my gameplay enjoyment factor, sense of achievement or precious online K/D stats" kind of behaviour. Let's be serious for a moment and understand that a) whatever the case may have been during BoB, the scope of the series is not just BoB, so we will end up needing both high and low octane versions (battle of France/phoney war/low countries anyone?) and b) both blue and red are currently missing their high performance rides (eg, about half the 110 fleet was running DB601N engines by the time of BoB and in certain regimes of flight this made them faster than the RAF fighters) The pendulum swings both ways really. Let's ask the developers to get the missing variants which are not even new flyables (same 3d models with a few numbers changed in their FM really) and be done with it, so we can both start using them according to what each one thinks is historically correct and move on to the next bit that needs attention ![]() |
|
|