|
Technical threads All discussions about technical issues |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Target visibility - UPDATE at post #97
I would like to open a new discussion about this subject.
It's great having a sim where the aircraft's 3D models are close to reality, where performances are very similar to the real ones, where we act on the strumentation as the WW2 pilots did. When we're infllight the complete picture is really photorealistic. The effects are great and it's almost like flying in a real aircraft (with physical limitation impossible to simulate, like G force,flames ect...). But IL2 (1946 and CloD) is not only a flight simulator... it's a COMBAT simulator. Here DMs are detailed enough and the weapons should be already modelled in the correct way. But you can shoot at an enemy only if you see it and here we have a serious problem: visibility is the most important thing in WW2 air warfare. I'm not talking about tracking a contact: I'm talking of DETECTION and IDENTIFICATION. With the help of 3D Studio Max we have reproduced a picture of a 109 at various distances. Then I've taken a pair CloD pictures from the "screenshot" thread (I hope the authors will not complain about this) and from these I've built new images. The error should be in the range of 1 pixel (I'm working with a 24" monitor, 1920x1080) As first we have the image taken with a 50mm (39.6 fov) to have what the human eyes see. Below is what we have in IL2's normal view (fov 70): Note that planes at 3km are already dots... But at which distance can a pilot detect a flying object? There are many variables: camouflage (already proved that it's not a magical tool http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc...c=GetTRDoc.pdf), human eye's threshold of acuity, eye's accommodation, glare, atmospheric haze, target speed differential, target profile, ect... some are really important, others are modest factors. I was looking for an analysis and here's I found something interesting: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...l.pone.0005594 Quote:
But what's the problem? Dots can replace the flight object but what about identification? A Dot is always the same at +3km, it does not give to us the profile of plane, its direction, the model of that plane. And more Dots are not always plane... in CloD ships are showed as dots at very long distance. Additionally dots are merging with the background and in the case of the detailed ground we don't have our eyes focusing on it and "excluding" the objects around it: the wider is the speed differential the easier is for our eye to focus on the target... Don't misread me... target identification is not a easy thing to simulate: they are still studying it and there are dozens of variables. Maybe one we all will be playing on monitor with amazing resolutions and it will be a lesser problem.. but in these days I think that Luther and Co. need to find a solution to it. Otherwise CloD will be a great flight simulator but an half WW2 combat simulator. I think that Dots are not the answer. What your opinion?
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 12-13-2011 at 07:15 PM. |
|
|