![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: Performance | |||
Runing well over sea, land and large cities. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 30.08% |
Runing well over sea and land. Large cities still a problem. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
50 | 40.65% |
Tuning well over sea. Land still causing problems. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 29.27% |
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd imagine most every one is running NT5 (Vista and later) by now, if only for the 64 bit support.
In that vein, it'd be interesting to see if there's any correlation between Windows own gaming performance index and what we're seeing here. For info, my gaming box has a six year old mother board and CPU, the rest has been updated from time to time, the latest additions being my (apparently very slow) SATA disks; and I'm happy enough with raw performance (design, on the other hand, don't even go there!): 6.1 Determined by lowest subscore Component Details Subscore Base score Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz 7.1 Memory (RAM) 6.00 GB 7.1 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 7.6 Gaming graphics 4095 MB Total available graphics memory 7.6 Primary hard disk 117GB Free (250GB Total) 6.1 Edit: Seeing as it's a Windows game, perhaps in future we can drop minimum req. hardware and start using the Windows index instead, for example: "You'll need to pull at least 5.9 to run this..." Last edited by Seeker; 06-09-2011 at 03:15 PM. |
|
|