![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
1) You'd be more historically accurate in this period if you used 2600 rpm for max continuous; 2650 came later. 2) The relationship between boost and revs is a bit more complex than that. The Merlin III has the original supercharger design, which suffered from some questionable design decisions made before RR hired SGH. It was not very efficient. Maximum performance was actually obtained at about 2800 rpm until the FTH for the desired boost was reached; above this altitude it was better to go to 3000 rpm to get more boost despite the frictional losses (and increased engine wear). This is the main reason for the two different combat concessions in the Pilot's Notes; the central entry supercharger was considerably more efficient and therefore later marks of Merlin used 3000 rpm for combat power at all altitudes. [I'm not very impressed with the massive boost increases associated with reducing revs, because it's quite hard to see where this can come from; the supercharger puts in kinetic energy from its tip speed (which is fixed at constant engine rpm), plus a component due to the radial flow along the vanes. This is then diffused into a pressure rise. There are therefore strict limits to the maximum supercharger pressure ratio obtainable at any given rpm. In reality, there might be a small increase in boost during a deceleration transient, but large increases are unlikely since the engine charge consumption varies directly with rpm, whilst the kinetic energy at the supercharger tip varies as the square of rpm. So in general one would expect boost to fall with rpm under normal circumstances - this might change at very low intake manifold pressures at or close to ground idle because of scavenging effects, but that's very much an edge case.] |
|
|