Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 03-07-2010, 01:22 AM
Gaston Gaston is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 59
Default Trust the pilots on this one...

He does say, right after "much better than the Me-109", that "you could curve it"... And he also adds that the "the only handicap" was the poor big nose visibility on take-offs and landing...

Rall says he could barely out-turn the 190A in the Me-109F (900 lbs lighter than G) when the first 190A models came out, and that most 109F pilots couldn't do it according to Rechlin: "They told us it out-turned the Me-109F"

A Russian large-scale combat evaluation summary has the FW-190A described as a "stereotyped" low-speed turn-fighter that will "inevitably offer turning combat at a minimum speed".

"The 190 does not like vertical maneuvers" they also add... "Keep speeds as high as possible against the FW-190"

The predominant opinion of 8th Air force pilots was that the FW-190A sustained turns better than the Me-109 (probably in a slightly wider radius than the Me-109 could do downthrottled very slow). This also was the opinion of British ace Johnny Johnson who describes in a post-war recollection being out-turned by a FW-190A in his Spit V, and adds that it was also known to turn better than the Me-109...

British tests have the 190 as superior turning to the 109, but US navy test follow what is the current consensus on the 190's character: No 190A combat experience for the US Navy, fortunately...

Also, a Sabre is an edged weapon shaped like a curve and creates large wounds when slicing in a curve... (Slicing being here an illustration of the firepower)

While a floret is light, straight, narrow, has no edge and can only be used in straight strokes to make a small, if deeper, hole: Pretty illustrative... It could very well refer to the 109's better high-speed handling when pulling out of dives after a diving attack, as the Russian evaluation has the FW-190A dropping 220 M (660 ft.) AFTER being nose-level during a 45° dive pull-out...

Trimmed tail-heavy, the Me-109G's 420-500 MPH dive pull-out was superior to a fabric-elevator P-51D...

Calculated conventional wisdom is simply in this case at 180° from the actual FW-190A reality. Note however the Me-109G could likely out-turn and out-perform the Anton above 7 or 8 KM, or at speeds above 250 MPH, which covers a lot of scenarios...

Formulas based on jet flight behaviour simply don't give good results with prop fighters...

Gaston
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.