![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
EDIT: ok ok I admit that my title is a bit provocative... but the graphs hereafter could be useful
Please read that. It is an extract from an article on Simhq.com on understanding and managing energy during a dogfight. Hereafter the author assume that we are in a P51 against a Spit IX For more info read : http://www.simhq.com/_air/air_011a.html With that graph you can clearly see that the P51 is undoubtly an energy fighter compared to the Spit wich is an angle (turning fighter). The upper thick red and blue curve represents the maximum instantaneous turn rate of each plane while the bottom curve shows the sustained turn rate (when you don't loose speed while turning) You understand that the P-51 has an advantage above 255mph but a Spit can out turn a P51, even from above 255mph if it trades his airspeed for angles and be in a position for a shot fairly quickly[/QUOTE] (turn rate on one axis in degrees per second (dps) and true airspeed on the other in mph) ![]() Why do I present you those infos ? Because even if the Spit mkIX can out turn the P51D, the P51D is undoubtly considered has a better end war fighter than the spit MkIX And Why because : Quote:
That is why while history considers P51 and FWs as the best fighters, we gamers find the Yak3 (or even IL2) best suitable for our game. In the same article the autor shows that the Spit MKV is an angle fighter compared to the spit MKIX. Therefore the Spit MkV would be more suitable for our turning dogfight than the spit MKIX, but military history considers the MKIX more performant Hope its clear Last edited by Benrizz; 09-30-2009 at 09:22 AM. |
|
|