Olegs SimHQ interview

[Novotny]

Oh really, can't you guys do this by pm?

Originally Posted by Feuerfalke

Oh, with pleasure, Tree!

How about this post on SimHQ (you posted a similar statement here). I just had to LOL, especially considering it's based on this statement by guod:
"Yep. Among other things, work continues on SoW."

Your reply:


http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.ph...2708028/2.html


Priceless!

How in the world can he DARE do something else than programming SoW?


I also love your PROOF-quote that Oleg promised he will release systems specs this month:

That's not an example of me being disappointed, you must try harder. Must be a language thing.

[Skarphol]

Originally Posted by Novotny

Oh really, can't you guys do this by pm?

+1!

Skarphol

[furbs]

i dont mind...quite entertaining really

[virre89]

Originally Posted by zapatista

why give it to 1C first ? it is an interview by a sim website (simhq.com), with oleg as a game developer answering their questions.

i presume the same information might still later show up in this il2 forum at 1C because so far oleg has been irregularly communicating with us, and it might well be seen by them/him as an alternative to the update we have been waiting for in the last few months.

I Guess your previous statement about SIMHQ doesn't apply anymore as soon as it's about BOB, or did you forget that even games are made to earn money..

Originally Posted by zapatista

simhq is a commercial venture, and nowadays is a website and forum that is run to make money (it wasnt at its inception, but was later sold by its original creator), and by the looks of that admin post there is a large volume of negative comments on RoF in their forums and simhq is now worried it risks reducing the revenue they can make from RoF game/retail advertisers. if anything their statement is an indication of censorship and how they try to contain negative posts by blocking discussion on this issue (seems most people that intended to, now wont buy the game), in past instances simhq were able to walk the fine line without using censorship and i thought they managed controversial issues fairly well, this time they havnt.