![]() |
#231
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#232
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
#233
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am sure you can find all kinds of references to 100 Octane fuel in the 1930's.
Here is the Popular Science archives to help you out! http://www.popsci.com/archives It was quite a leap forward in fuel technology and was greatly anticipated. |
#234
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Help me how?.....I wasn't highlighting surprise at reference to 100 octane prior to 1939, it's practically common knowlege.
No the real surprise is that you 'still' insist 87 octane was the main fuel in use......has anyone asked you to produce a shred of 'evidence' yet?
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
#235
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Fuel costs were a factor, reading the papers show that the British were quite aware and sensitive of the costs. Bomber Command's request for uniform supply of stations with 100 octane was turned down, even at the cost of a rather awkward system with both 87 and 100 octane stocks at these stations. The British got their fuel supplies from the market, and had limited amount of cash. Try doing some shopping without money.. things don't come free, even in war.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org ![]() |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not issued. Initially using a provisional specification R.D.E./F/100, later manuals refer to 87 octane, 100 octane or 150 octane fuels as such.
|
#237
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Read the Operating Notes.....Spitfire Mk I, July 1940: ![]() |
#238
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() With all due respect - there is lots of literature written about this era. It's one of the most researched in all aspects. I've never heard of pilot account mentioning something like ''Oh blimey I've been just transferred to this new squadron and they still fly on low octane fuel and gosh is it difficult now to fight the Jerry''. I hope you agree that the difference was big enough to be mentioned. Somewhere. I've just spent last year reading all these books and articles again while I am involved in this sim. Fascinating stuff on both sides. No mention of 87 octanes whatsoever. On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence (direct and indirect) about 100 octane spirit since the French campaign. Please don't get yourself confused with certain claims some people here are trying to make, these theories are rather ridiculous. ![]() Although I agree we never know if all the RAF fighters got only 100 octane fuel, it is the most relevant for what this sim represents. Unless you want to fly some OTU Spitfire in Scotland. Yet, we haven't got it modelled. ![]()
__________________
Bobika. |
#239
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#240
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|