Friday Update, June 01, 2012 - Page 11

He111 · #**101** 06-04-2012, 01:01 PM

P2 ?? ... P3 ?? .. P8 ?? ..

.

David198502 · #**102** 06-04-2012, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6S.Tamat

And obviously the fault was caused by the winers, never satisfyed by anything.

joke of the week

Anders_And · #**103** 06-04-2012, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chivas

You couldn't be more wrong if your name was Mr Wrong and the Mayor of Wrongville.

Most of the development team is working on the game engine and features that can apply to COD and all Sequels and MMO's, those features include AI, Commands, FM, DM, Clouds, Water, Dynamic Weather. Only the map makers, and eastern campaign builders are working on aspects that can't be aplied to COD and any other sequel.

And you know this because??!

Thee_oddball · #**104** 06-04-2012, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osprey

C++ is native, not non native. What makes you think there are perf problem between the layers anyway? If so the answer would be to optimise that, not convert.

the core game is written in .NET and the tress are a C++ DLL hence the interop, and What makes you think there are perf problem between the layers anyway? is the fact that you hear that people have high FPS but still have stutters which gets fixed by turning OFF the tree's should be your first indicator that interop is causing a performance hit.

optimization? the game was in dev for 5 years before release...it came out of the gate with no doc, no dedicated server soft and very little content...at the very least it should have been optimised at release.

adonys · #**105** 06-04-2012, 02:14 PM

have it ever crossed your mind that it might be because of a bad implementation of the speed tree library?!!

Flanker35M · #**106** 06-04-2012, 02:16 PM

S!

My guess is that Luthier's team is patching up something the previous programmers did or did not do at all. Taking over someone elses code can be hard..

philip.ed · #**107** 06-04-2012, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6S.Tamat

And obviously the fault was caused by the winers, never satisfyed by anything.

How can it be their fault? The same whiners who are content with Il-2 1946, a much older game? It's the lack of content, failure to actually simulate the Battle of Britain (BoB2 offers much better offline gameplay) and the consistent bugs and lessening features.

ACE-OF-ACES · #**108** 06-04-2012, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6S.Tamat

And obviously the fault was caused by the winers, never satisfyed by anything.

One thing for sure.. it didn't help maters

Baron · #**109** 06-04-2012, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philip.ed

How can it be their fault? The same whiners who are content with Il-2 1946, a much older game? It's the lack of content, failure to actually simulate the Battle of Britain (BoB2 offers much better offline gameplay) and the consistent bugs and lessening features.

Having nothing to complain about other than the colour of English countryside would be a dream come true right about now im sad to say.

Iv been on the positive side the entire time, but now, i lost interest completely. It pains me to say this, oh god, you have no idea, but there really is some truth to the phrase "enough is enough".

Frequent_Flyer · #**110** 06-04-2012, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

One thing for sure.. it didn't help maters

I don't beleive any less complaining would have altered the course on Clod . I find it very ironic, the spokes person for 1C, has limited command of the English language, and the initials of his call sign are BS....