![]() |
#321
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find it surprising that nobody has bought the wreck. I've seen wreckage in much worse condition sold for restoration. A p40 in original flying condition should go between 1.5 to 2 million US $. It looked like all the parts were still there in the first video, even the instrument panel looked untouched. I understand that they send the military in to expose of the weapons and ammo but it would've made more sense to treat it as an archeologic recovery. Spoons and toothbrush approach instead of crowbars. Just having the whole thing filmed professionaly by a national geographics team would've made for a nice documentary. Some governement official in Egypt dropped the ball on this one.
|
#322
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#323
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
#324
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Guys, that is not a Tomahawk.
It's at least an E model, Hawk 87 series. It never had nose guns.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#325
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As I said,I hope that it will be taken to a museum and exposed as it was found,since this is a proper archaeological find,not a restorable barn find. |
#326
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Gigabyte Z68 Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler 8GB Ram EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W 64 GB SSD SATA II HD WIN7 UL 64BIT |
#327
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looked like they were being quite gentle to me (in their own way).
During the 80's a group of enthuiasts went to recover a Spitfire from a mud flat near Broome Western Australia. They saw the cannons were still loaded so they called the RAAF. The RAAF sent in a team who, to the Horror of the Enthusiasts, stapped explosive charges to the magazines and exploded them. Whats more important? A 70 year old wreck or the lives of the recovery team? The RAAF obviously went for the latter. Cheers! |
#328
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Totally mate yeah, kinda like the same relationship between the Spitfire and the Hurricane, Spitfire was to dazzle the girls, the hurricane was to kill the enemy.
|
#329
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some thoughts on the 2 videos......
The big guy at the end of vid 2 is the rich guy, the boss. My guess is he is associated with the oil drilling operation. From the look of him I think his interest extends to more than a few ebay sales. The guy with the hood and his arm around the big guy is possibly AWOT's friend, the oil explorer who made the discovery and reported the find to someone - possibly the big guy. Most of the guys in the 1st vid are wearing the same trousers with a stripe - employees of the big guy and have been tasked to move the aircraft. The recovery is officially sanctioned - based on the army removing the ammo. The guy on the wing at the end of the 2nd vid is removing a wing root access panel - this isn't souveniring behaviour - it suggests to me that they are trying to remove the wings the proper way. The gunsight removal may be souveniring or could be an attempt to remove items that may be damaged in the recovery / lifting operation. In almost all recoveries from far off places things go missing - the 110s/Stuka/Fw190 from Russia all suffered in some way so a few pieces may well go astray. The deep slash in front of the windscreen is new and quite worrying - why do such a thing and what tool would make such a mark with outward facing tears? They have already made an attempt to remove the rudder (top hinge disconnected) and possibly the left elevator (access panel open). From all this I think we have a guy in charge who knows the value of what he has. He is wealthy and has a team who work for him. I think the videos show the start of the dismantling process and these have been put out there to generate interest. This may be an overly positive view but I hope I'm right. I do hope AWOT can get back to us with a real assessment of the future of this bird. |
#330
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
delete
|
![]() |
|
|