|
|
#32
03-02-2012, 11:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, confused here too. Given the amount of time passed I was hoping that this patch would convert the rushed release version to what it should have been (fixed bomber and other FM problems as well as the graphics performance). Maybe not.
|
|
#33
03-02-2012, 11:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The way I read it the current plans for the Beta patch are focused on and limited to field-testing the new graphics engine. In itself that is a major issue and deserves and needs careful testing. This is supposed to be the solution of one of the fundamental problems of the game, after all.
|
|
#34
03-02-2012, 11:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In real life the aircraft performance was a minor fact as you write: the famous "it's the pilot, not the plane" was a factual sentence. A Bf109F4 pilot, even a great one, could be ambushed and taken down by a greater pilot in a hurricane. This because in an ambush the defender can't exploit the plane's performance. Instead because of the limitations of the sim it's really difficult to be ambushed so every fight it's more a "plane vs plane" then a "pilot vs pilot" (think about the experience of the average pilot, he can it refly so he learns something at every KIA... the line between great pilot and average pilot is real thin). I think it would be nice in a sim having the player choosing a plane because of its cockpit visibility than the 30km/h of more speed because of the different fuel. Anyway I agree with th OP about the question...
__________________
 A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-02-2012 at 11:59 AM. |
|
#35
03-02-2012, 11:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#36
03-02-2012, 11:34 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I dont know what to say? No other fixes ( FM, DM, AI) in incoming patch? Luthier start to think about 100 octan fuel performacne in CloD???
 So after performacne beta patch we will be waiting another few months for other fixes??? It looks for me that 1C focus on future Russian Front addon or tanks battles in game and BoB is postponed to rest. Actually i dont care too much about Russian Front casue i played it about 10 years in old IL2 but i really wanted to play good simulator in BoB scenario unfortunately it looks it will not happend soon. Backing to play ROF. |
|
#37
03-02-2012, 11:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#39
03-02-2012, 11:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The CTD issue comes from the "old" gfx engine ... writing a new one wasn't done because the MG coders were bored or didn't like the writing style of the previous one.
 EDIT: I hope they understand now, BlackSix. You could hardly be any clearer. 
|
 |
|
|
Thanks B6.
Linear Mode
