Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:04 PM
Tickl3 Tickl3 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Dropped it? Nope. Not true.

Troll post reported.
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?
  #172  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:07 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luftrofl View Post
I'm using a 560ti. Spends most of its time running Battlefield 3 maxed out just fine. .


LoL, no u dont.
  #173  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:09 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

226 posts in 10 hours, most of it OT drivel.

How are we to find sensible questions and answers that are OT?

For god's sake lock the thread, BlackSix isn't likely to post anything more here that wouldn't be buried within two hours.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
  #174  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:10 PM
BaronBonBaron BaronBonBaron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 89
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendo65 View Post
Thanks Blacksix and Luthier for the update.

A word to those finding fault, I'm not normally that bothered about people expressing their opinions, but after what is a very decent update with an in-depth report from Luthier on the difficulties they are encountering I'm amazed to find people throwing it back in his face. All you armchair software development experts who think you personally know better...! Take a look at yourselves.
+3!

Last edited by BaronBonBaron; 01-27-2012 at 04:25 PM.
  #175  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:18 PM
Urufu_Shinjiro's Avatar
Urufu_Shinjiro Urufu_Shinjiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tickl3 View Post
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?
Hmm, I guess I missed it the first read through, but going back and looking again I think I do see where the project is dropped, it says it right here:

Quote:
So our general status report is very simple. Everyone is working very hard doing the same thing they were doing a month or a year ago. Graphical programmers are working on graphics. Network programmers are combing through the network code. Plane modelers are building 3D models of aircraft. No one stopped. Nothing was abandoned. On the contrary, the team continues to grow.
Oh...wait...
__________________
CPU: Q6600 GO @3.6ghz
GPU: EVGA GTX570 SC
RAM: 2x2Gb DDR2 1066 4-4-4
HDD: 2x250Gb HDD RAID0
OS: Win7 Pro x64
Gear: TrackIR4 & G940
  #176  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:18 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tickl3 View Post
Read it again. It says BASICALLY dropped it.
Once again, having an opinion is not trolling.
Just because you disagree with what i say that means i should be banned or have my posts deleted? Isnt that the whole meaning of a forum? To discuss things and express opinions?
Yes that's what a forum is for, so you expressed your oppinion and others expressed their oppinion on it, this just seems to turn people like you into bile spitting looneys who take things a step too far.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #177  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:20 PM
BigC208 BigC208 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 252
Default

B6, Thanks for the update. Keep us in the loop. When it's done it's done.
  #178  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:22 PM
phoenix1963's Avatar
phoenix1963 phoenix1963 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
It’s our pleasure to continue our weekly updates in 2012!
....
So we address each issue at its own speed. Some bugs can be fixed very quickly, and they are. We can update a cockpit lever animation or fix a type in a matter of minutes. On the other hand, locating a memory leak can take many long months of dedicated work by some extremely qualified programmers. All bugs are not created equal.
[/FONT][/B]
I sympathise. It once took me 6 months to find a stack overflow that was writing over data belonging to another processor.

Some of the people here simply don't understand.

Looking forward to the patch.

56RAF_phoenix
  #179  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:26 PM
J.Reb J.Reb is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Most of us feel we actually got a bit less than we paid for (this happens all the time), but only a very small minority wan't to punish 1C for the rest of their lives, Bewolf was spot-on with 'entitlement junkies'.
The only entitlement people want is for the game to work correctly. And it is due to them because they bought the game in good faith with money they worked for. What part of this don't you understand?


Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Thousands? I doubt it, secret agenda? more like it but the secret part isn't so secret, it's clear they wan't COD and probably 1C to fail, why? god only knows.
Pretty stupid thing to say. I have bought everything Oleg has come out with, and wound up satisfied because he released necessary patches. I hope CoD will wind up the same.
  #180  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:32 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urufu_Shinjiro View Post
Hmm, I guess I missed it the first read through, but going back and looking again I think I do see where the project is dropped, it says it right here:



Oh...wait...
according to Luthier ( a post in the past) they abondened the Battle of Britain scenario. No totaly new planes/cockpits, no ships for it.
I hope the RAF and RA planes wil get their FM and CEM corrections (the Lw planes are needed in thevBoM scenario ).
From Engine and GUI improvements both scenarios will get benefit - at least that is my understanding of 1C's development plan.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.