Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: When will the next beta patch be released?
thursday!!! 1 0.74%
this friday 18 13.24%
during next week 15 11.03%
during the week after the next week 12 8.82%
in three weeks 9 6.62%
after a month 12 8.82%
two months 2 1.47%
three months 5 3.68%
this year, hopefully.. 20 14.71%
in two weeks 42 30.88%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1031  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:35 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Exactly..say what you want when you want, it will get edited or it won't, this forum is nothing like you've seen before as it has 2 rules not just 1 so basically you lose......everytime

@Crane...box art is good, I like the map in the collectors edition, it's well wicked
  #1032  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:35 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvrdi View Post
I think the next big patch ("optimisation" patch) will be crucial......turning or failing point...they know that...
IMHO next patch will not solve more than 50% of crucial issues. I hope there is a chance that BoM solves 90% if the team adopts Oleg's perfectionism and uncompromising quality control procedures.

Anyway looking at 3rd party addins and scripts by Banks, Small_Bee and others I am very confident in 3-5 years this engine provides the best flight-sim experience and fun ever imagined. Not to everyone of cause.

PS. RoF and DCS are good too.

Last edited by Ataros; 01-20-2012 at 02:40 PM.
  #1033  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:43 PM
JG5_emil's Avatar
JG5_emil JG5_emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigC208 View Post
Ok, you spend $50 on a game and it does not work. Suck it up.
This is a ridiculous argument banded around on this forum. Collectively we as a community have spent millions of $.

If we all chipped in for a Ferrari and it wouldn't run properly should we suck that up as well?

No one is asking for premature releases etc but dropping us a line every week or so is hardly a big ask...even if there is little to report. Like I said it only takes a minute or two to write a couple of lines.
  #1034  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:51 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

millions? on COD?
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #1035  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:53 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalimba View Post
Now this is akward...We have to beg for some information about a game we paid full money for but isn't quite what was "promised"
Based on this forum.. The biggest problem with CoD is not what was promised and not delivered, but what the community 'believes' was promised and not delivered. Combined that with people unrealistic 'expectations' and 3rd party 'hype' of what should have been delivered and it is easy to see why these types of people are so upset and even feel cheated.

The only cure for this feeling of being cheated is for these types of people is to take the time and list all the things they 'belive' they were promised and compare that list to what was 'actually' promised by 1C (i.e. listed on the box or official 1C web sites and advertisement). Than and only than do they stand the chance of realizing that the list is actually a very short list.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #1036  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:55 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

wow, already 4 pages about nothing....and the most stuff said a trillion times already in the past (from both sides btw)
  #1037  
Old 01-20-2012, 03:04 PM
Cataplasma Cataplasma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Based on this forum.. The biggest problem with CoD is not what was promised and not delivered, but what the community 'believes' was promised and not delivered. Combined that with people unrealistic 'expectations' and 3rd party 'hype' of what should have been delivered and it is easy to see why these types of people are so upset and even feel cheated.

The only cure for this feeling of being cheated is for these types of people is to take the time and list all the things they 'belive' they were promised and compare that list to what was 'actually' promised by 1C (i.e. listed on the box or official 1C web sites and advertisement). Than and only than do they stand the chance of realizing that the list is actually a very short list.
1. Luthier said that sli and crossfire are working so I bought the game, but they're not.

2. I won't buy Battle of Moscow, this is the cure for my feeling.
  #1038  
Old 01-20-2012, 03:07 PM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
The all sims have bugs excuse is lame. It runs but it does not work very well. It has no AA or AF, AI is porked, SLI is porked etc. etc. It could be great but it is not even close nine months after release.

Yes all sims have bugs, its just that CoD has WAY more than most and is not even finished (complete redo of graphics in the works).

Perhaps BoM is not an add-on, but it does not interest me as much as BoB and I certainly will not buy it if CoD is not fixed. As many others won't if CoD is not finished first. I hope they do get it finished.

Luthier has said they'll continue working on CoD so what's the problem? He has stated very clearly that they're working on CoD and BoM in parallel. I for one am very happy that they're working on the graphics....any increase in FPS is good in my book and I'm quite prepared to wait for that and many other goodies.

1c, like any other company, must pay wages and bills. They MUST develop new products to generate future earnings as they'll be out of business in no time. We really can't expect them to remain completely fixated on CoD as that would be business suicide which wouldn't be good for us or them would it?

I personally don't see any problem at all with paying full price for the BoM product if that means I immediately get access to a host of new and exciting objects, features and improvements for CoD at the same time. It could be like a new game. Most features that have been postponed for BoM were never officially promised for CoD - they were just hopeful noises made by Oleg and crew at various points in the development. As such, we really can't complain that they won't be handed out free as a CoD patch.

On the other hand, radio comms, AI and crashes do need to be addressed as patches and from what I've read from the devs, this is all in hand. All will come good in time. Be sure.
  #1039  
Old 01-20-2012, 03:08 PM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cataplasma View Post

2. I won't buy Battle of Moscow, this is the cure for my feeling.

Bet you do.
  #1040  
Old 01-20-2012, 03:09 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cataplasma View Post
1. Luthier said that sli and crossfire are working so I bought the game, but they're not.
Like I said.. a short list

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cataplasma View Post
2. I won't buy Battle of Moscow, this is the cure for my feeling.
Promise?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.