Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-23-2011, 01:31 PM
Faucon Faucon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUCKIE_JG52 View Post
PS: Faucon, I'm looking for your great videos and all of them were deleted on youtube, what happened?
Deleted by youtube

Here is the new one. I just uploaded 2 videos of some flights with Cap10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Cap10Aer...s?feature=mhee
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-23-2011, 01:59 PM
TUCKIE_JG52 TUCKIE_JG52 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faucon View Post
Deleted by youtube

Here is the new one. I just uploaded 2 videos of some flights with Cap10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Cap10Aer...s?feature=mhee
Nice to see you online again, but I'm missing your virtual videos like "Rolls", and specially, your VFAT 2010 display, that unfortunately missed and it's not on livestream...

I see we are flying almost the same plane, you fly the Cap10C, I the Cap10B. Someone told me that C is more agressive, I don't know...
Comparing to 1946, I've found that apart on power, Ki-27 behaves very similar in some aspects to our Mudry, what do you think?



And just one more thing... Alabeo, the new company I told in the previous page, has announced today his first aerobatic addon... the Pitts S-1S, but... for FSX

I think they'll doing a big mistake, only eye candy, no good FM!


Last edited by TUCKIE_JG52; 11-23-2011 at 02:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-23-2011, 02:05 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atag_snapper View Post
i bought it for the trains. When will they become flyable?
rotfl
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-23-2011, 02:14 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trumps View Post
Why on earth would anyone buy a BoB sim and not play it because the Sukoi didn't make the cut?
It is strange..

I think a lot of the people who complain in this forum have that kid in the back seat mentality..

Where they think if they ask 'ARE WERE THERE YET' every 30 seconds that it will some how magically make the distance between point A and point B shorter.

When in fact the only real effect it has is on the driver (in this scenario Luther) who learns to tune these kid-os out..

Well that is the modern PC effect..

Back in the day the effect use to be that of the driver spinning around and backhanding the kid-o while doing 75 down the road..

Another true parenting skill that has been lost in the modern PC world

But I digress..

In summary the scary part is the kid-o really believes he is helping by making the distance between point A and point B shorter!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-23-2011, 02:41 PM
Kongo-Otto's Avatar
Kongo-Otto Kongo-Otto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Posts: 391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faucon View Post
Deleted by youtube

Here is the new one. I just uploaded 2 videos of some flights with Cap10.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Cap10Aer...s?feature=mhee
Wow, just wow!!!
S!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-23-2011, 03:27 PM
KeBrAnTo's Avatar
KeBrAnTo KeBrAnTo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Madrid, SPAIN
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUCKIE_JG52 View Post
Ahh, I like the "positive" and "open mind" way behind your words!

Sorry, but this is an excellent propeller plane sim, not only WWII. If people don't see far beyond it's not the problem of the rest of the simmers who want realistic planes in a realistic simulator instead of eye-cany planes in non realistic simulators.

Anyway, the more planes there will be, the more best seller will it be. Want it or not, civillian planes on civillian simulators sells more than combat planes in a combat simulator only. The key to survive is spread to more markets.

And talking about realism, some real flyers are expecting more realistic flight model effects to be implemented in CoD, like true P-Effect, and specially, PROPWASH, there's not only torque on a propeller plane! Hope all these will be implemented on future FM reworks!


Some of us already use 1946 as a serious training for real life aerobatics. Ki-27 behaves very similar to the plane I fly. So we also want this kind of real training in CoD.
HI Tuckie, I agree with you regarding the "economic" aspects of your words, and the FM modelled in the sim, no doubt at all about that.

Said that, what I do not consider a priority, neither should be for the devs, and I do not agree with, is to start including "extras" in a WW2 combat sim that needs to be deeply fixed first.

Once it is fixed, everything is running as expected and all the WW2 combat simmers are happy with the product they should be hands-free to spend as many efforts they consider adequate in order to bring aerobatic planes or even a 747 so they can steal Microsoft's FSX market into IL2 CoD if they want to, but until we reach that moment I think it is not serious to start other sub projects, they should focus on fixing the WW2 sim, that is what it is in the first term regardless if the FM is better or worse, or if it is good to make more profit on a non yet finished product or not, and first make customers who bought their longly expected WW2 combat flight sim happy.

I just built my home-made cockpit at home last month, and I would be really interested and could be asking for an additional feature implemented in the sim in order to get support for external gauges and not having to develop it by myself. Am I doing so?, No.

For me this would be more interesting than aerobatics which I'm am not interested about at all, but I think there are more important things that should be dealt with before starting dealing with particular or minority requests, that's all.
__________________
Former member of:
StG111 2003-2005 | SG1 2006-2009 | 15.Span 2010-2011


CPU Intel i7 920 @ 2.67 -> OC 4 Ghz MB ASUS P6T Cooler Noctua NH-D14 Memory 12GB
GPU 2x nVidia 285 GTX 1GB SLI HD 2x SATAII WD VelociRaptor 150GB RAID 0
SB ASUS Xonar DS/DT 7.1 PSU Tagan 1100W OS W7 Ult.64 LCD LG W2284F-PF
TrackIR 3 Pro + Saitek X-52 + Saitek Pro Rudders Pedals + Pro Flight Throttle Quadrant + Saitek PcDash 2

Last edited by KeBrAnTo; 11-23-2011 at 03:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-23-2011, 03:27 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faucon View Post
COD is the only simulator with correct FM to do aerobatics. FS is far far far far behind (I've tried the Extra300 and some addons, it's just ridiculous). IL2 is even better.
Or I've never heard about another good simulator. If it exists I would be glad if you tell me.

The reason why I bought COD is not your problem. If it wouldn't be so unfinished (at its release), may be I could say I didnt buy it only for aerobatics.
Tried X-Plane? Thats supposed to be an improvement on FSX FMs.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-23-2011, 03:41 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Bliss View Post
lol you guys. In all seriousness though, Faucon deserves his Su26.

If you don't know anything about Faucon's team - The Virtual French Aerobats, I highly suggest watching this: http://vimeo.com/7454012

AND here's another team:


lol seeing a prop plane flying aerobatic routines meant for jets is quite funny (other than not realistic )
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-23-2011, 05:15 PM
Faucon Faucon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
lol seeing a prop plane flying aerobatic routines meant for jets is quite funny (other than not realistic )
Jesus... Never speak about things you dont know.






Enough?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-23-2011, 05:24 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by faucon View Post
jesus... never speak about things you dont know.

enough?
owned!
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.