Luthier Update Clarification Please

[Ze-Jamz]

Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville

I second this fellows motion! Only right and proper though, innit blud?

lol

[mazex]

Originally Posted by Sven

I think it's good that they are also working on a squeal, if it is like the previous sequels/stand-alones the old maps and airplanes will be available as well in the new product and so the BoB will continue to improve graphically, FM and AI wise ect.

+ 1

That's the way they have worked before and no signs of any change in that.

The problem is that if even the die hard fans that populate this forum (?) threaten to not buy a sequel if feature x is not there I loose all hope. This is the only WW2 sim available from this decade and the only alternative would be a RoF WW2 release? But I can just imagine a furball with 500+ aircraft over London in RoF. Talk about squermish engine over the flat and empty fields of Flanders with some small towns...

Mazex

[mazex]

Originally Posted by robtek

I think it is plain dumb to expect/demand any freebees!

We all had our time wasted with this program, a part had fun complaining, a other part had fun playing and exploring and the majority had fun reading the forii.

So, everybody got something for his/her money, no reason to complain.

And in Software it is always expensive to be the early bird.

+ 1

But listening to some of the people here you could think they has bought some IBM server software like Websphere for a couple of billion $

Mazex

[McFeckit]

A couple of billion for WebSphere....yep, that'll be about right....and it's still a bloody nightmare!

Sorry, off topic.

[touchdown42]

Originally Posted by SNAFU

I hope too, that the BoB 1940 szenario will be extended in its content and will not be dropped with the release of the successor BoM 1941. It would be a shame...


Moin Touchdown,

english meaning of eventual is not our meaning of eventuell...

eventually = finally => schlußendlich

Ahhh, thx, better use an online dic next time before posting

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by mazex

But listening to some of the people here you could think they has bought some IBM server software like Websphere for a couple of billion $

Agreed 100%

Flight simming is an expensive hobby! Always has been and most likely always will be! Just to play these $50 dollar games you have to spend at least $1k on a decent PC and joystick.

With that in mind

May I make a suggestion to those that constantly bring up the $50 dollar cost of the game?

If your financial 'worth' (read your starbuck's job or allowance from your parents) is such that your 'life' will be impacted by the outcome of a $50 dollar game, than I highly recommend that you give up flight simming or any other aspect of PC gaming and play something you can afford, like checkers! Which in turn would mean you would not have to make those hard decisions in life like 'flight sim' vs. 'shoes for the kids' or 'flight sim' vs. 'eating tonight'. Just a thought!

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by robtek

I think it is plain dumb to expect/demand any freebees!

We all had our time wasted with this program, a part had fun complaining, a other part had fun playing and exploring and the majority had fun reading the forii.

So, everybody got something for his/her money, no reason to complain.

And in Software it is always expensive to be the early bird.

+1

[Foo'bar]

Battle for Moscow. Look at display from 1S-Softklab

[Sven]

That IL-10 might be a hint towards the Korean expansion? Sure doesn't belong in the winter of '41-'42

[Icebear]

Originally Posted by Foo'bar

Battle for Moscow. Look at display from 1S-Softklab

Great find....thank you Foo'bar !