![]() |
#741
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#742
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also a new request :
Nakajima B3N Torpedo Bomber, I know its prototype, but what if its in WWII. Here what it looks like : ![]() |
#743
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The I 400 never sailed with it's intended aircraft, or on it's intended mission (attack of Panama Canal).
The other classes of IJN subs would be more useful. But I't take anything I can get.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#744
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think with some of the '46 aircraft in the sim, we can allow a bit of artistic license on the Pacific front too....
|
#745
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh I agree with that.
But then we would need a Rita, Kikka and Shinden. ![]()
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#746
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and why not?
![]() I'm in no position to make demands, but I feel the experimental weapons on the Pacific front have been rather neglected. Had another thought too, maybe a USN variant of the P-80, with arrestor hook etc? |
#747
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please, please, please do something about the ability of gunners, both human and AI, to fire accurately (or at all) while the airplane is maneuvering violently.
I'm so sick of taking hits from inverted bombers pulling 5 "G's". Does anybody really think this kind of thing as at all reasonable? And it's been like this for how long? It's long past time for this incredible oversight to be addressed. I.D. |
#748
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is one of the best things about Cliffs of Dover.
The AI gunners behave like humans under stress and not robots from the planet Argus 9. You can attack BF 109s and actually have a chance in a stern attack, unlike in IL2 where they snipe you from great distance. In fact all encounters with aircraft that have flexible gunners stations are far more realistic in Cliffs than IL2, and result in far more historical outcomes. (110s get slaughtered, as in real life).
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#749
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
USN: Vought OS2U Kingfisher (most important operationally and numerically). Free of copyright, but not as good: Curtiss SOC Seagull, SOC3 Seamew or SC Seahawk. RN: Swordfish Mk I (with floats) or Fairey Seafox, Supermarine Walrus (off-limits due to CloD) or Supermarine Sea Otter. Also, US lend-lease designs could substitute; the RN used the SO3C Seamew. IJN: Mitsubishi F1M Pete, Aichi E13A Jake. VVS: Beriev Be-4/KOR-2. Regia Marina: IMAM Ro-43 France: Liore 130 The problem is that the sort of work that patrol/recce floatplanes did doesn't lend itself to in-game action. In the game, they're just targets and there are already plenty of planes which serve that role. Last edited by Pursuivant; 07-16-2011 at 07:17 PM. |
#750
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or, just being able to place objects on top of other objects, so that you could, for example, put trucks or cargo on piers.
|
![]() |
|
|