![]() |
#701
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#702
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
US P40s operating in China used the "bazooka" type rocket launcher tubes. This was well after the AVG was merged into the regular Air Corps of course. Also, the Hawk 75s as used by the Dutch in the Netherlands East Indies should be able to carry a bomb under each wing. KNIL Hawk 75s in the ground attack role successfully bombed a bridge to slow, at least for a short while, the advance of the Japanese in Java.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#703
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if possible, check the variometer indication speed...
i think that are too slow... after diving, i saw the altitude increasing, but he are still indicating altutide loosing... |
#704
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please is possible include the Avia B-135, i hear about this model for IL-2.
Model made by Stoupa, and i don´t know so this is finish or not... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tank´s |
#705
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tail looks like a Hurricane, other parts like a Spitfire!
![]()
__________________
If you are insecure: use more bullets. |
#706
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i think this is good reference for P51 B&C cockpit...
http://www.stclairphoto-imaging.com/...g/P51_swf.html |
#707
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very nice plane, I hope TD would add that in the next patch or this patch.
|
#708
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I disagree with that, Yes the tail might look like a Hawker Hurricane. The engine and the propellars doesn't look like a Spitfire.Also the front of the Avia B-145 model looks more like a Typhoon. But skins doesn't make it look like a Spitfire or a Hurricane.
|
#709
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
If you are insecure: use more bullets. |
#710
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, TD.
First, I would like to thank you for your continuous hard work on the development of IL2. As follows is my request for the incoming patches. Would you please fix the high altitude performance of late-war 109s in the incoming patch? Both historically and according to IL2 Compare, late-war 109s should outrun and outclimb P-51 and P-47 at high altitude. But in the game, what 109 pilots can do is merely struggling for a level flight above 8000m. Let alone maneuvering and climbing. This problem has been existing ever since the birth of IL2. Oleg once mentioned that the inaccurate high altitude performance was due to the limitation of IL2 engine, which was originally designed for low altitude air combat scenario. But while P-51 and P-47 can perform normally high up. I believe there should be a way to fix this problem. Also, is it possible to modify the cockpit of late-war 109 variants? The cockpit struts are just too big compared with real 109s, which make 109 pilots suffer from a great SA disadvantage in combat. Thank you!
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place? ![]() |
![]() |
|
|