What about a better simulation? - Page 2

bongodriver · #11 06-05-2011, 12:56 PM

I can assure you it is not mandatory....or all the taildraggers I fly are 'broken'

Plt Off JRB Meaker · #12 06-05-2011, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob_baer

I think tailwheel block is mandatory with a "non tricycle" gear in a real plane. Combat flight simulator 3 had this feature.

Erm....with all respect,just because 'Combat flight sim 3'has this feature it does'nt mean that it was a great flight sim,on the contrary I personally thought it was awful,iL2 COD with all it's faults is far more realistic than that effort from Microsoft.

skouras · #13 06-05-2011, 01:17 PM

thats true
CFS3 VS IL2
IL2 WINNER

Much more realistic and accurate...

=XIII=Shea · #14 06-05-2011, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sauf

"Look Out Luthier"

lol

bob_baer · #15 06-05-2011, 03:23 PM

Of course it's far more better! Maybe there are good things from other sim that can be implemented. For example what about aerodynamical effects on controls when approaching sound speed in the dive? It was a real problem!
Ok for the tail wheel sorry!

Warhound · #16 06-05-2011, 03:26 PM

I've accidently locked my tailwheel in one of the bombers as I had the key mapped to "max secondary illumination" aswell..so it is there on planes that had it back in the day.
Radio is being worked on as per Luthiers post here :
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=23532
And aircraft documentation is pretty much being done by community video's and a soon to be FAQ someone was working on (for now).

So keep on trucking as most of the things you want are on their way.