|
|
|||||||
| Rig'n'Roll Truck racing game, sequel to the famous Hard Truck series. Drive authentic trucks along real Californian roads, deliver cargo, take part in truck races or establish your own cargo transportation company. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#71
11-18-2007, 01:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
 They want to give up 800x600?! That's the only screen resolution I use. 
|
|
#72
11-18-2007, 01:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
that is the one i use most of the time as well.
|
|
#74
11-18-2007, 03:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#75
11-18-2007, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And as far as 800x600 goes, guys that's 20th Century. I mean come on, what's the point of demanding cutting edge graphics from developers if you're going to use the ole-grainy 800x600? I think you really need to get a new monitor/vid card 
|
|
#76
11-18-2007, 11:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Crt Ibm
|
|
#77
11-19-2007, 04:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I got a question for 1C. The barriers I see on some pictures on the interstates and highways that seem to block access to some ramps and stuff. Like the old ones in Los Angeles.
What are their purpose? Road Construction or Temporary Closures? "End of World" blockers, like in 18WoS: Convoy? "Your route is this way" blockers(aka forcing to go 1 way)? Would be ticked if they are "Your route is this way" blockers. As I was hoping if you have a load, you would be able to go any which way you want to get to your destination. Quote:
It still is. There's no reason why developers won't support it. I got a Geforce 7600GS, but I still use 800x600. Any bigger and it hurts my eyes.
|
|
#78
11-19-2007, 09:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
You guys missed my point. I was not telling 800x600 was the best in 90's ... but if you think about it, it did was an awesome resolution back in the days - do you deny this fact?
What I was saying guys, is that it's not logical to use 800x600 nowadays when modern technologies offer cutting edge graphics which 800x600 res will not reflect to full extent. With that said, though, I still do not understand what the problem is with supporting lower resolutions from developers point of view, since I somewhat know what is involved, and I know it's not a problem to implement the support for it ... for instance, there was one old game which had support only for 4 resolutions (640x480, 800x600, 1024x768 and 1280x1024 I think). Well time went ahead, game became old, PCs became more advanced and so the folks cried for more. I modified the EXE to support virtually any resolution they can think off, without actually owning the code of the game... just HEX-edited a couple of things, and now they are all happy campers having all resolutions. What I'm saying is that developers just decide on their own what resolutions to incude in the drop-down selection box, but that not necessarily means there are some technological difficulties supporting lower resolutions... it's just that they don't want ... the SDK supports everything out of the box.... Oleg
|
|
#79
11-19-2007, 11:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
  But, I agree with JOleg. What's the point in asking the developers fo good graphics if you aren't going to use them? You're both stuck in the past (no offense ). Besides, a better resolution isn't such a big hit on FPS. On Flight Simulator X, I raised the resolution form 800x600 to 1240x1024 and only 1 framerate was lost.
|
|
#80
11-19-2007, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
well i dont use 800 x 600 much only when i am running more then 1 program and the part about being in the past when you have a wife and is newly wedd your money would be stripped of cash as well. Since i got married this year i really do not have the money to get somethings right now like a monitor.I would gladly switch over if you are willing to buy me a new monitor
Bigbubba467
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
