gtx 590 anyone ?

[HKLE]

Hi folks

I just ordered a new rig. Basically quadcore Intel, 8 GB, 120 GB SSD (+ 1 TB conventional drive) and a Nvidia GTX 590. Sorry, I have no more detailed specs at the moment. Does anybody have already experience with this card ?

[Widowmaker214]

Yes. I have two of them.

990x (stocked at 3.6 ghz, 3.8 with the gigabyte boost button. but I can over clock it to about 4.6 or so easily. Just need to water cool it for that)
12 GB DDR3 1600
OCZ Vertex 3 SSD

and twin EVGA GTX 590s (quad SLI)

on SLI enhanced games, its awesome.
But on games like Rise of Flight and Cliffs of Dover.. you cant use it to your advantage.

I can still get 60 FPS in Rise of Flight but I have to turn a few things down.

In Cliffs of Dover.. with land/buildings set to medium... leaving aircraft and effects on HIGH..Im getting about 50 FPS on the single core.

there was a note that SLI will be enabled when the next nvidia drivers come out with a profile for it.. so who knows.

I tried creating my own profile for it, then enabling 4 GPU rendering.. and I was getting 3 fps.

If they get SLI working.. it should do quite nicely.

[HKLE]

it is an investment in the future, as I see it. Makes no sense to switch to GTX 580 I guess ? Thanks for the reply. The target should be to run everything maxed out, especially the beautiful landscape ....

[HKLE]

Originally Posted by HKLE

it is an investment in the future, as I see it. Makes no sense to switch to GTX 580 I guess ? Thanks for the reply. The target should be to run everything maxed out, especially the beautiful landscape ....

Hi Widowmaker

By the way, I had this discussion on Ram 800 or 1600 - does this make a real difference gamewise ?? (1600 not readily being available now)

[HKLE]

Originally Posted by Widowmaker214

....
But on games like Rise of Flight and Cliffs of Dover.. you cant use it to your advantage.

I can still get 60 FPS in Rise of Flight but I have to turn a few things down.

In Cliffs of Dover.. with land/buildings set to medium... leaving aircraft and effects on HIGH..Im getting about 50 FPS on the single .....

Hi Widowmaker

Is it so bad ?

My current rig is somewhat intel core 2 duo 2600 and a GTX 260/2, win7 32, 4GB ((Iknow, that Win does not adress all of it) and at least for ROF, I did not have the impression, that he game has problems. On the other hand, with my current rig COD just has to be turned waaaay down in settings in order to make it playable.

I realized the current drop in FPS with the latest patch too, by the way. Usually I do not fumble much around with settings, once they are ok for me, but now I have to.

[T}{OR]

You would have been better off with a single 3GB GTX 580. This way with a 590, you will only have 1.5 GB of vRAM effectively, and if the game doesn't support SLI - slower GPU than the GTX 580.

If you really wanted a proper SLI solution, 2 x GTX 580 3GB should have been your choice.

Not to mention that GTX 590 has a cheap power regulation, so I wouldn't recommend any OC - especially no 24/7 OC.

Originally Posted by HKLE

By the way, I had this discussion on Ram 800 or 1600 - does this make a real difference gamewise ?? (1600 not readily being available now)

Not sure I understand this - do you mean DDR2/DDR3??

[HKLE]

Originally Posted by T}{OR

You would have been better off with a single 3GB GTX 580. This way with a 590, you will only have 1.5 GB of vRAM effectively, and if the game doesn't support SLI - slower GPU than the GTX 580.

If you really wanted a proper SLI solution, 2 x GTX 580 3GB should have been your choice.

Not to mention that GTX 590 has a cheap power regulation, so I wouldn't recommend any OC - especially no 24/7 OC.




Not sure I understand this - do you mean DDR2/DDR3??

First - I am meanwhile aware of the GT 590 characteristics. Unfortunately, the 3 GB 580 is no option at the moment because of no market availability. So I am stuck with 1,5 GB 580 or 590. Second - the 590 promises a lot of potential due to its SLI design. Third - it is not noisy. Forth, it consumes a lot less power than 580 .... ?!! So - even it seems to be the worse choice at the moment, I will stick with it now. My PC seller told me, that I may change the card within a few months, if not satisfied, so what ...

Concerning RAM, its DDR3 ....

[HKLE]

I am able to play with high settings, 1920 resolution and over 30 FPS, thats what I am aiming at the moment.

[T}{OR]

Originally Posted by HKLE

So I am stuck with 1,5 GB 580 or 590.

In both solutions you have only 1.5 GB of VRAM - 1.5 GB is assigned to each GPU core. Even when SLI is working, you only have 1.5 GB of VRAM effectively.

Originally Posted by HKLE

Forth, it consumes a lot less power than 580 .... ?!!

You mean less than a proper 580 SLI solution.




Cheap power regulation, runs very hot, "only" 1.5 GB of usable VRAM, and with no working SLI for CloD yet - I can not see it as a better option than a GTX 580, or 2 x 580 in SLI.

Originally Posted by HKLE

Concerning RAM, its DDR3 ....

1600.

[HKLE]

Originally Posted by T}{OR

....
Cheap power regulation, runs very hot, "only" 1.5 GB of usable VRAM, and with no working SLI for CloD yet - I can not see it as a better option than a GTX 580, or 2 x 580 in SLI.

1600.

So ? I cannot get the 3 GB version 480 at the moment. So - even if SLI support sometimes should be available for COD - I thought I read about it somewhere ?! - I should be better off with a 1,5 GB 580 ?

So - maybe I am stupid - but what then is SLI for ?


Concerning the power question, I got the quote from my seller, that for a 580 I need a stronger power input, with the 590 i dont ??? (We are basically upgrading a "gamer PC" tht they are offering)

I still have the chance to change things tomorrow, so your Input is very appreciated ....