Pathetic performance

[jt_medina]

I have just tried IL2 COD. The only thing I have to say it seems like an Alpha version instead of the release version. Horribly poor performance even in online maps which is incredible to me given the small size of the online maps.

I think I'll keep an eye on the coming patches and see if performance improves but right now I have to say goodbye to be able to even play online maps.

Stuttering and low frame rate. I don't think it's a ram problem but the way buildings and trees are shown. Just my guess.

My Specs

CPU QuadCore 2 2.50
GPU ATI 5770 1GB
RAM 4GB
Win 7 64 bits.

Originally Posted by BadAim

You have no reason to expect to be able to run COD at max settings with your rig, except for your own ego. COD is a flight simulator, not a FPS. Try about medium settings, the game will still look fantastic, and it should run pretty well once they get the initial bugs stomped.

Wasted cores, a GPU that is barely being touched. It looks like we have to wait for Cliffs of Dover to catch up to the hardware.

[Heliocon]

People need to stop making idiotic crysis comparisons - especially since cryengine 3 is cut down in a large variety of ways and polished to run super smooth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WJG14uLA3k

*corrected below, I meant engine not game

[zauii]

Originally Posted by Heliocon

People need to stop making idiotic crysis comparisons - especially since cryengine 3 is cut down in a large variety of ways and polished to run super smooth.
crysis 3 = WOP
Crysis 2 = COD

More like
Crysis 1 == Cod,
Crysis 2 == WOP if anything

[Heliocon]

Originally Posted by zauii

More like
Crysis 1 == Cod,
Crysis 2 == WOP if anything

Sorry I meant
Cryengine 2 (crysis) = COD
Cryengine 3 (crysis 2) = WOP

(cryengine 1 = farcry)

[Heliocon]

Originally Posted by Shrike_UK

After my stint of developing for the largest investment banks in the world, i was in charge of deliverring applications that, in manies eyes would have been a miracle to get done on time. For example, singlehandedly i built a back office brokerage application dealing with trade algorythms to produce trade data (yes confirming settling ond amounts of money to settle in millions) to confirm with brokers, full GUI, fully working, documented. I had 4 days to do it. And i did it, the whole thing fully working with no bugs. with 4 nights of 3 hours sleep. but was told to do it by management without doing overtime and fit it somehow into 9-5 job so i had to even lie and say i did it 9-5. after completion i was then hit by the clients with more features to add.

If you focus on what you know you can deliver, and get basics working such issues as FPS, at least, with Agile methodology, a customer would be partially satisfied. I feel sad for IL2 team really i do. But really am a bit mystified how its still not ready, they should know the code inside out by now. after all this time.

I LOVE YOU

Thank you from all the daytraders who were at the desk when the stop losses got hit and the dow dipped 10% in 2 minutes. They should of payed you more ^^

Well actually I am in FOREX not stocks but its the same for high frequency trading.
Question- if you know about FX when facilitating a exchange, does the program automatically break up the order into units or does the desk decide if/how it will be divided up?

Thanks

[mearle]

Im happy I got the russian version,only wasted 8 quid.

[Ctrl E]

Originally Posted by Smit

kinda have to agree with the topic starter now, the performance is a disgrace and the team involved should be ashamed releasing what is quite clearly an unfinished product with the worst optimization of hardware ive seen to date. The game in its present state is unplayable and should never have been released.

agree. would have like to have been in the room when it was announced it was going gold. programmer: "you fecking what?"

[V3teran]

This game is very very laggy even on single player running on the lowest settings for me,my rig should be more than capable of running it successfully.

[GloDark7]

Medium or above and I CTD

In light of this continually growing Technical threads sub-forum, I have to wonder if 128 player online was ever a realistic vision???