![]() |
#61
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For those of you who have never seen tracers being fired in person, why argue about someting you have never actually seen?
Tracers appear as streaks, just like in Star Wars. Where do you think George Lucas got his inspiratiation? From dogfighting gun camera film and movies showing anti aircraft fire. Anything this size moving at 2000 miles per hour will appear as a streak. From what I have seen of the movies and sceenshots of Cliffs of Dover, Ilya is right, they are perfect and I am happy to finally have tracers that look realistic.
__________________
STRIKE HOLD!!! Nulla Vestigia Retrorsum |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to emphasize one point that has been mentioned. Please look at this photo, in which the man is Picasso,
![]() The bright line (yes, that is one single line) is a camera's view of Picasso's torch, also a "tracer". The line is so long and even, only because the exposure time of the camera was very long, to the extent that during this period Picasso was able to draw the whole "bull" in the air. What the camera "saw" is a bull, while the human eye would of course only see the moving torch. There is of course similarity between the way in which the human eye works and that of the camera, but such similarity (not identity) only exists in the optical part of the human eyeball, the neural mechanism of the eye and visual cortex being missing in the case of the camera. It a complex subject that perhaps psychologists on percerption know much about, but it is certain that what a camera sees is not exactly what a human sees. Another example: a human can be dazzled by bright muzzle flash of a cannon, but not by a photo of the muzzle flash, meaning that the camera cannot reproduce enough gradations of bright light that a human eye can tell. So movies of tracers and gun camera film are not good arguments when tracers are discusssed, unless it is the aim of CoD to simulate only the camera's view. Although I myself have never in person seen tracers being fired, I have doubt that the "light rod" of each tracer should be of both the same brightness and the same width from beginning to end. ~ Last edited by Upthair; 02-15-2011 at 02:39 AM. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Here are some videos. This one shows .22 tracers during the day. Here are rifle calibre rounds approaching the camera at night. I'm not sure how visible they would be during the day from this angle. Sometimes you can't see them at all during the day. Tracers in .45 ACP?!?! Why? Generally speaking, they have done a pretty good job on the tracers, but I'm wondering how visible they will be when they are between a light source and you. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Cheers Last edited by Skoshi Tiger; 02-15-2011 at 03:22 AM. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm thinking more for people who have more money than sense given the muzzle velocity and effective range of the .45 ACP round.
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right!
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"What doesn't match is the length. In reality, they would appear shorter when close to the observer (that is, when leaving the barrel) and almost immediately "shrink" to the size of a dot, just like the ones in the 110 picture."
Once again, this is a perfect description on how it shows in reality. |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
XBL GT: - Robotic Pope HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope |
#70
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't see anyone who has actually seen tracer fire complaining in this forum about how they look in CoD but rather saying how good they look. Doesn't that really say it all? I have seen and fired hundreds of thousands (estimated) during my time as a Paratrooper and the CoD tracers look great!
__________________
STRIKE HOLD!!! Nulla Vestigia Retrorsum |
![]() |
|
|