Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-15-2011, 05:12 AM
baronWastelan baronWastelan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: the future home of Starfleet Academy
Posts: 628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smink1701 View Post
Opinions?
This is a stupid thread. How's that for an opinion?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-15-2011, 05:47 AM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I'll keep it on my drive for a while, but I have a feeling that the new sim is going to make '46 look and feel pretty dated. If this is so I can't see myself spending much time at all with the old sim.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-15-2011, 05:50 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

il2 was the best combat flight sim ever... though I haven't run it since I reaslied something was not right, this was ten months before the revelation the sim had been hacked.

I'll run SoW/ CoD without hesitation and hope a PTO add on is created in the future.

Last edited by Wolf_Rider; 01-15-2011 at 05:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-15-2011, 06:18 AM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecke View Post
I will instantly delete it. Together with Hyperlobby it's two more programs less on the HDD and the registry.
Unless they force us to use publisher servers, how do think that's gonna work without a server like HL?
(HL is a server(!) not just a progi)

An inbuilt game search function which has to ping all the CoD servers on the planet?
Ppl with low-end systems, slow internet(or both) would love such a feature...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-15-2011, 06:35 AM
Azimech's Avatar
Azimech Azimech is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leerdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecke View Post
I will instantly delete it. Together with Hyperlobby it's two more programs less on the HDD and the registry.
Short on harddisk space? We're in the Terabyte age
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-15-2011, 10:39 AM
I/ZG52_Gaga I/ZG52_Gaga is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 174
Default

I give IL2 another 10 years at least ....
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-15-2011, 12:31 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

as i mostly fly bombers nowadays in on IL2 servers (COOP online war flying seems almost dead it looks like ) i will most propably switch to CoD totaly very fast.
Depends on the online offers i dont fly offline at all.
but i guess some very nice, high qualitiy online servers with some good missions will appear very fast

and i realy hope, and i actually expect it (!), that the bomberflying in CoD will be more demanding (engine management, bombsetting settable in flight, better damagemodell of "targets" ) than in IL2
Ju88, He111, Ju87, Br.20, Blenheim IV , there is something to choose from
and i hope the number of flyable bombers will grow ! Flyable Wellington and Do17 are demanding.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-15-2011, 12:33 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
Unless they force us to use publisher servers, how do think that's gonna work without a server like HL?
(HL is a server(!) not just a progi)
No it's not, it's just a server browser. If the game has one built in like just about every other game since about 1997, it won't be necessary any more. It's supposed to be on Steam, so that right away eliminates the need for HL.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-15-2011, 01:29 PM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default

I suspect I'll keep IL2 around for some time for the greater variety of scenarios, but like a few others, I suspect also that BOB will be so superior in immersion, that it'll be tough to go back.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-15-2011, 02:05 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadAim View Post
I suspect I'll keep IL2 around for some time for the greater variety of scenarios, but like a few others, I suspect also that BOB will be so superior in immersion, that it'll be tough to go back.
Have to agree, when IL-2 was released I just couldn't go back to Jane's WWII Fighters and EAW, the feel of flight and the general high fidelity of IL-2 was just too great to refrain from.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.