Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-13-2011, 07:32 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

DT are watching this thread

In the case of the MK21 few RAAF Beaufighters ever carried a gun in the observers cockpit. There are just 2 images (that I am aware of) of MK21's ever the showing a rearward facing .303 MG but thats about it, one of the images (A8-99 over Princess Bridge Melbourne) is a little sus and looks as if it has been retouched. The other one shows a MK21 (A8-95) over the Melbourne Shrine of Remembrance that has a gun in the back but thats about it. Given only the MK21 is modelled in IL2 (and only the RAAF operated the MK21) then discussion of the early marks in RAAF/RAF service is perhaps redundant, however in most cases they also did not carry any rearward facing armament.

In RAF service the TF.X a rearward facing .303 calibre weapon was common, where a specific non bubble observers cockpit was fitted

The idea of Nav providing SA by Bandit sightings etc has great merit.

Last edited by IvanK; 01-13-2011 at 09:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-13-2011, 12:07 PM
_RAAF_Firestorm _RAAF_Firestorm is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 71
Default

Ivan, your words are music to the ears of so many people!

Great to see that you've done some research on the matter already. We'd love to hear more about what you've got in the works but obviously understand that you guys can only share information selectively.

Thanks for dropping by with a carrot!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-14-2011, 05:53 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

No promises Firestorm but hope springs eternal.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-14-2011, 06:03 AM
_RAAF_Firestorm _RAAF_Firestorm is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 71
Default

Indeed, how very, very true!

Another thread comes to a civil, happy end. There was mystique, drama and intrigue, a climax that was worth the toil... and in the end, we are left with renewed hope and the possibility of a sequel.

I'm heading off with a smile, to pour myself a glass of red. I plan to sip it slowly while standing on the back deck, staring at the sunset.

Thanks Ivan.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-14-2011, 10:29 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Heres a few pictures of Beaufighters with what looks like guns.

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/UK1883
http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/MED1521

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-14-2011, 10:44 AM
Art-J Art-J is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger View Post
Heres a few pictures of Beaufighters with what looks like guns.

http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/UK1883
http://cas.awm.gov.au/item/MED1521

Cheers!
These are not Mk-21s and they're not operating in Far East though!

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-10-2011, 02:43 AM
Buster_Dee Buster_Dee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 219
Default

Does anyone have any TR1133 info (Transmitter T1136, Receiver R1137 and Amplifier A1135 pics), or at least the layout of the boxes when radar was also installed? The 1133 would have been the typical radio system used by the observer. (the TR9 preceded it but wasn't very good and doesn't seem to have lasted beyond late 1940).

Last edited by Buster_Dee; 02-12-2011 at 12:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-10-2011, 07:14 AM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

If I'm not mistaken, the Mk.21 Is simply an Australian designation for the British Mk.X.

It seems the Mk.X is more likely to carry the rear gun. Since the versions are so similar, it shouldn't be a massive undertaking to make another available.

Is there any word on the Devastator? It sure would be nice to have.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-10-2011, 08:12 PM
TheDawg TheDawg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 68
Default

as mentioned, in full tick servers, it would be nice to stab the C key and take a quick look if nothing else. I see AI gunners start peeling the MG's around long before they touch off a round. I've used that to keep my eye to the sky-
As often as Ivan winds up screaming at me from the back seat of the IL2, why not some cockney dude yelling something about an intruder-
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-10-2011, 08:26 PM
jameson jameson is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 222
Default

Dawg,
I think we'd stopped deporting cockneys to Oz by the start of ww2....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.