![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For all of Tree's droning, at least he is for the most part nice to people, perhaps a bit more patience is in order, as a matter of fact, when someone mentioned that it was getting a bit much in a polite manner, he actually backed of a bit. That's what reasonable people do.
I'm only saying that I don't think the original response was called for, especially in this thread, and there was certainly no reason to have escalated it so. I'm not sure where you're from Zap, but accusing a man of having a lack of moral fiber over a petty argument is just over the top, at least where I come from. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Worm of Store.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here: http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/ __________ ![]() Flying online as Setback. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Hunden; 08-22-2010 at 02:56 AM. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can always use the ignore function Andy thats what i often use.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nerd fight, just the sort of thing the WWW needs. Come on Lady's time to put on you Big Girl panties.
![]() |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1) a recent post of his in this same forum commenting on a single short glimpse of another flightsim product (which previously under great fanfare was dismantled and believed to be dead forever by microsoft) Quote:
2) but when a NEW flightsim enthusiast joins this board with interest in the upcoming project (who most likely will then disappear taking with him the brief snips of info gleaned here to his cluster of friends and start a new batch of rumours) we predictably get tree's negative destructive one sided banter giving misinformation, except this time he slightly packages his turd with a little bow to pretend he is being all nice and helpful Quote:
predictably, and based on the previous character flaws he had been so consistently displaying here, tree then rapidly started backtracking and trying to squirm out of it, for which he now got a long deserved medal of the avian type the context of this all is that whatever delay's oleg is experiencing in the last yrs, which are not deliberate or by his neglect , his intention all along being to make the best possible sim he can given the resources he has to work with. if anything, his decision to not further evolve the il2 game engine and stretch it further, but make a completely different product "from the ground up" will be to all our benefit in the end, as most of us will very soon realize. so to constantly have this "slighted bride" behavior from tree is irrational, say it once that you are disappointed sure, but to CONSTANTLY do so for several yrs in most of the flightsim forums is just infantile (hence he gets treated as such, since he seems to only be able to communicate at that level), and for him to do so here so consistently and deliberately is plain offensive and rude to the creators Last edited by zapatista; 08-23-2010 at 02:39 AM. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Funny how the universe twists and turns
![]() i now get told last night, by somebody i have known over 10 yrs in the online flightsim world, that oleg's BoB has been postponed for another year !! this is a russian i have known since the days back to falcon 4, ms flightsim, mig alley, and to the inception of the original il2. wow so we have insider news ? great !!!...... but err, hang on, where did he get this juicy bit of information ? turns out his current nick is "highness" (lol, the original poster of this thread), and he dropped into the current oleg BoB forums to get some updated news and find out the latest ! hahahaha , gotta love the irony ![]() instead he got deliberately given misinformation from tree's with his moronic monotone singsong of lamenting discontent and negative depressive banter. "highness" presumed it was accurate because he had it directly from somebody on the 1C forums who has a high post count "and has been there awhile", and hey presto another damaging unsubstantiated rumor got started (all of which harms sales !!) i think tree should be booted for his persistent deliberate destructive behaviour, he's been temp banned for it before but obviously he has no intention to change. its not even some minor personal aberration he has, a quirk that might be overlooked otherwise. he is doing it deliberately and constantly, and yes it is not only plain rude and ungrateful of him (given the amount of information we get here and being given the access to "constructive input and feedback on WiP), but it is also has some damaging effect as has been clearly illustrated by this series of events Last edited by zapatista; 08-23-2010 at 08:33 AM. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Zapatista...you dont half talk a load of twaddle...no offence of course.
|
![]() |
|
|