Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:00 PM
akuma akuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorgothNL View Post
Bit of a strange argument , can you image any game at all, that would word with that idea in the back of your head?

the WW2 pilots didnt play for FUN, they fought for and with their lives. We play a game, for fun (or so I think we are). An ace in a jet, against any piston plane, isnt fun.
And no, the WW2 pilots didnt say 'meh, they have jets, Im outa here'. We have a choice, and we can try to get an option of switching jets off.

game - real life
choice/fun - no choice/not funny

^^ you see the difference

a simple option of turning them off wouldnt bother many people. I agree they should be in the game, but I also agree that they ruin a lot of games.
So, is a on/off button so strange to wish for ?

PS. no I dont really mind a jet opponent, I mind them in my own team, because they will give you one less dogfighter. Just a guy who zooms by now and then
As an opponent:
1. he's not an ace -> they have one guy 'less' (a noob in a jet is not even 1/4 as dangerous as a noob in a piston).
^^ this sucks because I dont want an easy victory

2. he's an ace.. and there is NOTHING you can do about it, not even if you are better them him in your piston. If he knows how to fy it, there is no chance you can kill him

so, no, dont mind jets, but also, there is no way they make the game more fun
Again though, turning the jets off because you dont like them would be like turning machine guns off in a FPS because you personally didn't like them. Sure you can do it, but are you better for it, or just proving your lack of skill to play the game you bought by ignoring a major factor because it doesn't suit your own personal play style?

All the games I host (which is pretty much every game I play as I get bored looking for games) is 1946, so if you come to my game, please leave complaints at the door! (not you personally it was an open statement)
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:01 PM
kod30 kod30 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wissam24 View Post
And yes, I play on Sim as much as I can. And hardly anyone takes the jets in Sim, because they're absurdly hard to use in that mode.
i vividly remember the 262's engines catching on fire all the time because you throttled up too fast on the PC version.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:01 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wissam24 View Post
Well, I for one cannot fathom what the Po-2 is doing in there. Considering it has NO forward firing guns, and the bombs it carries are rather the suck, it's pointless.
Well seeing that the Po-2 is a bomber/recon plane, and not meant to dogfight. If they did have a forward firing gun, it would just add weight and considering the plane is like a WW1 plane, it would need a really light MG to be placed, not like the WW2 heavy MGs like in many many many, fighters etc.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:02 PM
Wissam24 Wissam24 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 283
Default

Well..yes. Hence, my point
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:04 PM
PantherAttack2 PantherAttack2 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma View Post
Again though, turning the jets off because you dont like them would be like turning machine guns off in a FPS because you personally didn't like them. Sure you can do it, but are you better for it, or just proving your lack of skill to play the game you bought by ignoring a major factor because it doesn't suit your own personal play style?
I agree with you there. Jets are perfectly fine to use. They were put in the game and are legitimate planes... Don't forget that although games are for fun, sometimes the fun is the challenge.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:06 PM
Gazz6666 Gazz6666 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Wales
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Well seeing that the Po-2 is a bomber/recon plane, and not meant to dogfight. If they did have a forward firing gun, it would just add weight and considering the plane is like a WW1 plane, it would need a really light MG to be placed, not like the WW2 heavy MGs like in many many many, fighters etc.
I think he means in game terms, not reality terms. The bombs, at least in terms of taking out Strike targets, are absolutely pathetic, and since there's no point in an unarmed (or near-unarmed) recon plane in the game, it does seem kind of pointless.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:07 PM
Wissam24 Wissam24 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 283
Default

Gaz gets me!
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:08 PM
MorgothNL MorgothNL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma View Post
Again though, turning the jets off because you dont like them would be like turning machine guns off in a FPS because you personally didn't like them. Sure you can do it, but are you better for it, or just proving your lack of skill to play the game you bought by ignoring a major factor because it doesn't suit your own personal play style?

All the games I host (which is pretty much every game I play as I get bored looking for games) is 1946, so if you come to my game, please leave complaints at the door! (not you personally it was an open statement)
I do agree on that argument . And yes, it is because it doesnt suit my playing style, or the style of the game I want to play. (personal opinion is ok right ?)

and my games are also 1946, because I dont want to lose planes like the LA-7 (not flying it myself). I just hope people dont take a jet. if they do, and I really dont like it at the moment, I will ask them to take another plane. 9/10 times they do, wich is great . if not, so be it
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:08 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

What we need, is a squadron set up only to fly He-126 Salamanders! Me-262s and Me-163 Komets just seem to be very broad in most aspects, the He-126, just seems to be more flexable? I dunno.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:10 PM
Gazz6666 Gazz6666 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Wales
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wissam24 View Post
Gaz gets me!
Woo-hoo!

I think the important distinction that needs to be made here is this;

Game - for fun
Reality - not for fun

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.