![]() |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
All the games I host (which is pretty much every game I play as I get bored looking for games) is 1946, so if you come to my game, please leave complaints at the door! (not you personally it was an open statement) |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i vividly remember the 262's engines catching on fire all the time because you throttled up too fast on the PC version.
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well seeing that the Po-2 is a bomber/recon plane, and not meant to dogfight. If they did have a forward firing gun, it would just add weight and considering the plane is like a WW1 plane, it would need a really light MG to be placed, not like the WW2 heavy MGs like in many many many, fighters etc.
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well..yes. Hence, my point
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gaz gets me!
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() and my games are also 1946, because I dont want to lose planes like the LA-7 (not flying it myself). I just hope people dont take a jet. if they do, and I really dont like it at the moment, I will ask them to take another plane. 9/10 times they do, wich is great ![]() |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What we need, is a squadron set up only to fly He-126 Salamanders! Me-262s and Me-163 Komets just seem to be very broad in most aspects, the He-126, just seems to be more flexable? I dunno.
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Woo-hoo!
![]() I think the important distinction that needs to be made here is this; Game - for fun Reality - not for fun ![]() |
![]() |
|
|