![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
View Poll Results: Would you sacrifice small graphical issues in order to be able to use 6-DoF | |||
Yes I could cope with this as it would add to my flying experience |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
270 | 85.44% |
No, I'd rather have my head on a fixed stick thanks you very much |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
46 | 14.56% |
Voters: 316. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
6DOF doesn't require trackir. I've got a version that works via the mouse. Kind of negates the argument that 6DOF is only for the rich or gives an unfair advantage to those willing to spend lots eh?
Cheers Leady |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I voted 'yes'. But I want to add: "...only, if its done in a different way as in modification."
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMHO we don't need full movement. A little 6DOF, just to look around struts would be well enough. I also think this would minimize possible complications.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
An option to have it on gives choice and you don't have to use those servers if you don't want to (but do you remember the mod/Vanilla server numbers before 4.10 came out?). While the graphics won't always be perfect the immersion will be improved and that has far more value than having your head stuck in a frame with perfect graphics just because the view is so limited. There are other things in Vanilla IL-2 that aren't perfect anyway. I would think the mods guys would have no problem working with TD given what they have achieved already. XXXXXXXXXXXI'm not voting because...XXXXXXXXXXXXX I'm voting, but..... 1. Its pointless, you could never get a proper poll through a thread 2. The players have already voted, just think back to the pre-4.10 server numbers and what they will be again when the mods community catches up with 4.10. I believe the single most preferred mod is 6dof.
__________________
klem 56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds" http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/ ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders Last edited by klem; 02-14-2011 at 09:46 PM. Reason: I lied. I decided to vote. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This would require no neew cockpits, and give not others unffair advantage. Myonly issue with 6DOF- ze mod, is that it simply does not work properly with rolling and panning around, when i use it i tned ot switch this off and keep my head on the pole. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
no vote recorded |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pointless argument regards adavantage/merits, anyone who wants 6DOF just adds it anyway.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think that adding features with known, correctable bugs without any intention of fixing said bugs is a professional thing to do.
I'm glad 1C avoids doing that kind of thing. We would have a poor game if they did that often. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
p.s. trackers hate padlock, it evens the score! ![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm.
Imagine Olegs horror at all the you-tube vid's of his sims cockpits with 6DoF showing glitched panels and invisible bitz and pieces all over the place. I don't think it should be an option or anything as it wasn't designed for 6DoF in the first place. . |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|